Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ethical issues in selecting embryos.

R Rhodes1

  • 1Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029, USA. rosamond_rhodes@mssm.edu

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
|October 12, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Decisions on Innovation or Research for Devastating Disease.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2021
Same author

A paradigm for understanding trust and mistrust in medical research: The Community VOICES study.

AJOB empirical bioethics·2018
Same author

Adsorbent 2D and 3D carbon matrices with protected magnetic iron nanoparticles.

Nanoscale·2015
Same author

Application of rapid microbiological methods for the risk assessment of controlled biopharmaceutical environments.

Journal of applied microbiology·2014
Same author

A phase I trial of oral ridaforolimus (AP23573; MK-8669) in combination with bevacizumab for patients with advanced cancers.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2013
Same author

Decreased regional gray matter volume in S' allele carriers of the 5-HTTLPR triallelic polymorphism.

Molecular psychiatry·2010
Same journal

Multiomics Profiling During Autoimmune Demyelination Highlights a Complex Regulatory Role for Ataxin-1 in B Cells.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

Global Trends in Light Pollution and Their Relationship With Socioeconomic Factors.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

Wired for Corruption: Inter-Brain Synchrony Encodes Bribery-Related Value Information and Predicts Bribery Agreement.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

LM-YOLO: A Lightweight Multi-Scale Enhanced Model for Forest Smoke Detection Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

Polyrhythm Perception and Production: A Scoping Review.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

DARTS-CNN-BiLSTM: Intelligent Fault Diagnosis for Computer Numerical Control Machine Tool Feed System.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
See all related articles

This paper examines the ethics of embryo selection in assisted reproduction, focusing on liberty and autonomous choice. It outlines acceptable embryo selection scopes and professional responsibilities for reproductive medicine practitioners.

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive ethics
  • Bioethics
  • Medical ethics

Background:

  • Assisted reproduction involves critical decisions regarding embryo implantation and pregnancy reduction.
  • Ethical concerns arise from using sex or genetic traits as selection criteria for embryos.
  • The debate centers on the moral permissibility of selecting embryos based on specific characteristics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review arguments against embryo selection based on non-medical traits.
  • To discuss embryo selection through the lens of ethical principles like liberty and autonomy.
  • To propose guidelines for the acceptable scope of embryo selection and professional duties in reproductive medicine.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of ethical arguments concerning embryo selection.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Philosophical analysis of liberty and autonomous choice in reproductive decisions.
  • Ethical framework development for evaluating embryo selection practices.

    • Main Results:

    • Arguments for rejecting embryo selection based on non-medical traits are critically examined.
    • The principles of liberty and autonomous choice are central to the ethical discussion of choosing offspring.
    • A defined position on the acceptable boundaries of embryo selection is presented.

    Conclusions:

    • Embryo selection requires careful ethical consideration, balancing reproductive liberty with potential harms.
    • Professionals in reproductive medicine have significant responsibilities in navigating these complex ethical issues.
    • Clear guidelines are needed to ensure ethical practices in assisted reproduction and embryo selection.