Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
The relative importance of task and contextual performance dimensions to supervisor judgments of overall performance
1Personnel Decisions Research Institutes, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414, USA. jeff.johnson@personneldecisions.com
Abstract:
Although evidence supports the unique contribution of task performance and contextual performance to overall evaluations, little is known about the relative contribution that specific dimensions of contextual performance make to overall performance judgments. This study evaluated the extent to which supervisors consider task and contextual performance by using relative weights (J. W. Johnson, 2000) to statistically describe the relative importance of specific dimensions of each type of performance to overall performance ratings. Within each of 8 job families in a large organization, each of 4 dimensions of contextual performance made not only a unique contribution but a relatively important contribution to the overall evaluation. Evidence also supports the adaptive performance dimension of handling work stress as an aspect of contextual performance and job-task conscientiousness as an aspect of both task and contextual performance.
More Related Videos
06:17A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
Published on: October 17, 2019
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Fundamental Attribution Error
Social Loafing
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory