Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Description and classification of extra-oral implants].

B Desmet1, B Bonin, S Palmer

  • 1Service de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale, CHU Lille, 59037 Lille.

Revue De Stomatologie Et De Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale
|October 16, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Systematic hydroxychloroquine retinopathy monitoring programme: cost benefit comparing to a hospital-based system.

Eye (London, England)·2024
Same author

Development of a highly sensitive and specific intact proviral DNA assay for HIV-1 subtype B and C.

Virology journal·2024
Same author

Identifying core components of a radiotherapy comfort intervention package using nominal group technique.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2023
Same author

Nursing, midwifery, and allied health professions research capacities and cultures: a survey of staff within a university and acute healthcare organisation.

BMC health services research·2023
Same author

Online activity - A beaming good initiative! Delivering alternative exercise opportunities for people with cystic fibrosis.

Physiotherapy theory and practice·2023
Same author

Expanding the time interval between ovulation triggering and oocyte injection: does it affect the embryological and clinical outcome?

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2020
Same journal

[Proceedings of the 48th Congress SFSCMF Surgery and pre-implantation and implantology,27–29 September 2012, Versailles, France].

Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale·2013
Same journal

[Contribution and limitations of MIS(®) screwed expanders in the jaws: illustration from clinical cases and comparison of the osseous volume from three-dimensional radiographic pictures].

Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale·2012
Same journal

[Complications of head and neck skin expansion].

Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale·2012
Same journal

[Complex fronto-orbital reconstruction with a PEEK prosthesis and skin expansion: about a case].

Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale·2012
Same journal

[PEEK customized implant for skull esthetic reconstruction].

Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale·2012
Same journal

[Subcutaneous malar nodule].

Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale·2012
See all related articles

No single extra-oral implant (EOI) suits all needs. This review compares endo-osseous and juxta-osseous implants, detailing their pros and cons, and explores emerging developments in the field.

Area of Science:

  • Dental Implantology
  • Biomaterials Science

Background:

  • Extra-oral implants (EOIs) are crucial for specific clinical scenarios.
  • Current EOIs do not offer a one-size-fits-all solution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare existing categories of extra-oral implants.
  • To discuss emerging trends and future directions in extra-oral implantology.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative review of endo-osseous and juxta-osseous implant systems.
  • Analysis of advantages and disadvantages of each implant category.
  • Exploration of ongoing research and experimental developments.

Main Results:

  • Extra-oral implants are broadly classified into endo-osseous and juxta-osseous types.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Each category presents distinct benefits and drawbacks influencing clinical application.
  • New experimental developments are expanding the possibilities in extra-oral implantology.

    • Conclusions:

    • The choice of extra-oral implant depends on specific clinical requirements.
    • Ongoing research promises advancements in implant design and functionality.
    • A nuanced understanding of available options is essential for optimal patient outcomes.