Related Experiment Videos
Evaluation and management of infants and young children with fever
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Darnall Army Community Hospital, Fort Hood, Texas 76544, USA. michael.luszczak@amedd.army.mil
Insights
Physicians and parents often disagree with guidelines for managing febrile children, preferring less invasive approaches. Controversy continues regarding optimal evaluation and treatment for serious bacterial infections in young children.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
Background:
- A 1993 practice guideline for febrile children under three years old generated significant controversy.
- Physicians and parents express reservations about recommended diagnostic procedures like venipuncture and bladder catheterization for non-toxic febrile children.
- Current practices often involve watchful waiting and less empiric antibiotic therapy than recommended.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the controversies surrounding the management of febrile infants and children.
- To examine the evolving landscape of serious bacterial infections in young children.
- To discuss the criteria for evaluating febrile children at risk for serious bacterial infection.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature and practice guidelines.
- Analysis of survey data regarding physician and parent preferences.
- Examination of epidemiological shifts in causative agents of bacteremia, such as the rise of Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Main Results:
- Widespread disagreement exists regarding invasive diagnostic procedures and empiric antibiotic use in non-toxic febrile children.
- Parental preference leans towards reduced testing and treatment.
- Streptococcus pneumoniae is now the predominant cause of bacteremia due to Haemophilus influenzae vaccination.
- Risk factors for serious bacterial infection include younger age, higher temperature, and elevated white blood cell counts.
Conclusions:
- Controversy persists regarding the appropriate age, temperature, and white blood cell count thresholds for further evaluation or empiric antibiotic therapy in febrile children.
- The identification of low-risk infants older than one month for serious bacterial infection remains an area of active discussion.
- Clinical practice may not align with established guidelines, necessitating ongoing evaluation of management strategies.
Abstract:
A practice guideline for the management of febrile infants and children younger than three years of age sparked controversy when it was published in 1993. Surveys indicate that many office-based physicians do not agree with recommendations for venipuncture and bladder catheterization in nontoxic febrile children, and that many employ watchful waiting rather than empiric antibiotic therapy. Surveys of parents note a preference for less testing and treatment. More aggressive management may be appropriate in febrile infants younger than three months old; however, criteria have been proposed to identify infants older than one month who are at low risk for serious bacterial infection. Because of widespread vaccination against Haemophilus influenzae infection, Streptococcus pneumoniae has become the cause of most cases of bacteremia. The risk of serious bacterial infection is greater in younger children and in those with higher temperatures and white blood cell counts. Controversy persists regarding the age, temperature and white blood cell count values that serve as indications for further evaluation or empiric antibiotic therapy.