Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...

Data Validation

Data Validation

Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...

Data Validation

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:

Instrument Calibration

Instrument Calibration

Instrument calibration is essential for ensuring that instruments produce accurate and consistent results. It is vital in manufacturing, healthcare, testing laboratories, and scientific research. Calibration processes are specific to each instrument and help enhance data accuracy. Each instrument has a unique calibration process tailored to its design and function to improve data accuracy.
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...

Measures of Intelligence

Measures of Intelligence

Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Agricultural injuries among operation household members: RRIS-II 1999.

Journal of agricultural safety and health·2007

Same author

Sports and recreational injuries: regional rural injury study-II: impact on agricultural households and operations.

British journal of sports medicine·2006

Same author

Lake Superior Rural Cancer Care Project, part I: an interventional trial.

Cancer practice·2002

Same author

Lake Superior Rural Cancer Care Project, part II: provider knowledge.

Cancer practice·2002

Same author

Chronic noncancer pain management.

Minnesota medicine·2001

Same author

Instruments to measure cancer management knowledge of rural health care providers.

Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education·2001

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 23, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

Design and validation of instruments to measure knowledge.

T E Elliott¹, R R Regal, B A Elliott

¹Division of Education and Research, St. Mary's/Duluth Clinic Health System, MN 55805, USA.

Journal of Cancer Education : the Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Education

|October 18, 2001

Summary

This study outlines eight key steps for creating and validating instruments to measure healthcare provider learning from educational interventions. These methods ensure reliable and practical outcome assessment for educational activities.

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 23, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

Medical Education Research
Health Professions Education
Educational Measurement

Background:

Assessing healthcare provider learning post-intervention requires valid, reliable, and practical instruments.
Existing instruments may not adequately capture learning outcomes from experimental educational designs.

Purpose of the Study:

To present a systematic approach for developing and validating instruments to measure learning outcomes in healthcare providers.
To provide guidance for researchers designing educational interventions and their evaluation.

Main Methods:

Conducted a comprehensive literature review on instrument development and validation.
Utilized practical experience in designing and validating instruments for educational interventions.

Main Results:

Detailed eight essential steps for instrument design, validation, and reliability testing.
Discussed critical considerations and rationale for each step.
Offered methods for critiquing, adapting existing, and creating new measurement instruments.

Conclusions:

The presented framework can assist investigators in developing robust instruments for evaluating educational activities.
Aims to enhance the quality and practicality of measuring learning outcomes in health professions education.