Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How does consensus scoring work for virtual library screening? An idealized computer experiment.

R Wang1, S Wang

  • 1Institute of Cognitive and Computational Science, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, 4000 Reservoir Road, Washington, DC 20007.

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences
|October 18, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Osteoarthropathy in pregnancy].

Zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi·2001
Same author

Glomerular laminin isoform transitions: errors in metanephric culture are corrected by grafting.

American journal of physiology. Renal physiology·2001
Same author

[The relationship of vascular endothelial growth factor and angiogenesis to the progression of gastric carcinoma].

Zhonghua bing li xue za zhi = Chinese journal of pathology·2001
Same author

Monte Carlo dose calculations of beta-emitting sources for intravascular brachytherapy: a comparison between EGS4, EGSnrc, and MCNP.

Medical physics·2001
Same author

Tmtacn, tacn, and triammine complexes of (eta 6-arene)OsII: syntheses, characterizations, and photosubstitution reactions (tmtacn = 1,4,7-trimethyl-1,4,7-triazacyclononane; tacn = 1,4,7-triazacyclononane).

Inorganic chemistry·2001
Same author

A panel immunoblot using co-incubated monoclonal antibodies for identification of melanoma cells.

Journal of immunological methods·2001
Same journal

Future Papers.

Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·2016
Same journal

Future Papers.

Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·2016
Same journal

Future Papers.

Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·2016
Same journal

Future Papers.

Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·2016
Same journal

Future Papers.

Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·2016
Same journal

Future Papers.

Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·2016
See all related articles

Consensus scoring, combining multiple computational methods, improves virtual screening hit-rates. This study shows that using three or four scoring functions offers optimal performance for binding affinity estimation.

Area of Science:

  • Computational Chemistry
  • Drug Discovery
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Virtual screening is crucial for identifying potential drug candidates.
  • Consensus scoring methods combine multiple scoring functions to enhance prediction accuracy.
  • Previous studies suggest consensus scoring improves hit-rates in virtual screening.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the underlying statistical reasons for consensus scoring's effectiveness.
  • To investigate the relationship between the number of scoring functions and hit-rates.
  • To evaluate different ranking strategies for consensus scoring.

Main Methods:

  • An idealized computer experiment simulating virtual library screening.
  • Generation of predicted binding affinities by adding random errors to observed values.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of hit-rates based on varying numbers of scoring functions and ranking strategies.

    • Main Results:

    • Consensus scoring statistically outperforms individual scoring functions.
    • The mean value of multiple samplings converges closer to the true binding affinity.
    • A moderate number of scoring functions (3-4) is sufficient for effective consensus scoring.
    • Rank-by-number and rank-by-rank strategies are more effective than rank-by-vote.

    Conclusions:

    • Consensus scoring enhances virtual screening efficiency through statistical principles.
    • Optimizing the number of scoring functions and employing appropriate ranking strategies are key.
    • This approach offers a robust method for improving drug discovery pipelines.