Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2026

Surgical Porcine Model of Chronic Myocardial Ischemia Treated by Exosome-laden Collagen Patch and Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
Published on: September 15, 2023
Beating heart myocardial revascularization on extracorporeal circulation in patients with end-stage coronary artery
E Prifti1, M Bonacchi, G Frati
1Divisione di Cardiochirurgia, Policlinico di Careggi, Firenze, Italy.
Insights
On-pump/beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with end-stage coronary artery disease (ESCAD) shows improved survival and reduced complications compared to conventional CABG. This technique offers better myocardial and renal protection.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- End-stage coronary artery disease (ESCAD) patients often have compromised left ventricular (LV) function and may not tolerate cardioplegic arrest well.
- Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) involves aortic cross-clamping and cardioplegia, which can be detrimental in high-risk patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of on-pump/beating-heart CABG versus conventional CABG in ESCAD patients.
- To evaluate early and mid-term survival, morbidity, and left ventricular (LV) function improvement.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 78 ESCAD patients underwent on-pump/beating-heart CABG (Group I) between 1993-2000.
- A control group of 78 ESCAD patients underwent conventional CABG (Group II), matched for age, sex, and LV ejection fraction (LVEF).
- Outcomes including mortality, morbidity, and LV function were assessed postoperatively and at 6 months.
Main Results:
- Postoperative mortality was similar (7.7% vs 11.5%, P>0.1).
- Group II experienced significantly higher rates of perioperative myocardial infarction (P=0.039), low cardiac output syndrome (P=0.002), and bleeding >1000 ml (P=0.029).
- At 6 months, Group I showed significant improvement in LVEF (27.2% vs 25%, P=0.001) and reduced LV end-diastolic pressure and diameter.
Conclusions:
- On-pump/beating-heart CABG is a viable alternative for ESCAD patients, associated with lower postoperative morbidity.
- This technique provides better myocardial and renal protection, reducing complications related to intraoperative hypoperfusion.
- On-pump/beating-heart CABG may lead to better LV function recovery in ESCAD patients.
Objectives:
To evaluate in a cohort of ESCAD patients (pts) the effects of on-pump/beating-heart versus conventional CABG in terms of early and mid-term survival and morbidity and LV function improvement.
Methods:
Between January 1993 and December 2000, 78 (Group I) ESCAD pts underwent on-pump/beating-heart surgery. Mean age in Group I was 66.2+/-6 (58-79), NYHA and CCS class were 3.2+/-0.6 and 3.3+/-0.4 respectively, Myocardial viability index 0.69+/-0.1 (%), LVEF (%) 24.8+/-4, LVEDP (mmHg) 28.1+/-5.8 and LVEDD(mm) 69.5+/-6. Group II consisted in 78 ESCAD patients undergoing conventional CABG selected in a randomized fashion from an age, sex, and LVEF corrected group of patients. Mean age in Group II was 65.7+/-5 (57-78), NYHA 3.1+/-0.7, CCS 3.4+/-0.8, LVEF(%) 25+/-5, LVEDP(mmHg) 27.9+/-4.4 and LVEDD(mm) 69.2+/-7.2.
Results:
Postoperatively, 5(7.7%) patients died in Group I versus 7(11.5%) patients in Group II (P>0.1). CPB time resulted to be in Group II patients (P=0.001) and the mean distal anastomoses per patient was similar between groups (P=Ns). Perioperative AMI (P=0.039), LCOS (P=0.002), necessity for ultrafiltration (P=0.018) and bleeding>1000 ml (P=0.029) were significantly higher in Group II. None of the Group I patients underwent surgical revision for bleeding versus 8(10.3%) patients in Group II (P=0.011). At 6 months after surgery, the LV function improved significantly in Group I patients, demonstrated by an increased LVEF=27.2+/-4(%)(P=0.001), lower LVEDP=26.4+/-3(mmHg)(P=0.029) and LVEDD=67+/-4(mm) (P=0.004) instead of a lower LVEDD=66.8+/-6(mm)(P=0.032) versus the preoperative data in Group II. The actuarial survival at 1, 3 and 5 yr were 90, 82 and 71% in Group I and 89, 83 and 74% in Group II (P=Ns).
Conclusion:
In ESCAD patients who may poorly tolerate cardioplegic arrest, on-pump/beating-heart CABG may be an acceptable alternative associated with lower postoperative mortality and morbidity. Such a technique offers a better myocardial and renal protection associated with lower postoperative complications due to intraoperative hypoperfusion.
More Related Videos
09:12Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
09:11Cell-based Therapy for Heart Failure in Rat: Double Thoracotomy for Myocardial Infarction and Epicardial Implantation of Cells and Biomatrix
Published on: September 22, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care