Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Continuous Manual Exchange Transfusion for Patients with Sickle Cell Disease: An Efficient Method to Avoid Iron Overload
Published on: March 14, 2017
Reporting of near-miss events for transfusion medicine: improving transfusion safety
J L Callum1, H S Kaplan, L L Merkley
1Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, and The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. jeannie.callum@swchsc.on.ca
Background:
Half of the reported serious adverse events from transfusion are a consequence of medical error. A no-fault medical-event reporting system for transfusion medicine (MERS-TM) was developed to capture and analyze both near-miss and actual transfusion-related errors.
Study Design And Methods:
A prospective audit of transfusion-related errors was performed to determine the ability of MERS-TM to identify the frequency and patterns of errors.
Results:
Events and near-miss events (total, 819) were recorded for a period of 19 months (median, 51/month). No serious adverse patient outcome occurred, despite these events, with the transfusion of 17,465 units of RBCs. Sixty-one events (7.4%) were potentially life-threatening or could have led to permanent injury (severity Level 1). Of most concern were 3 samples collected from the wrong patient, 13 mislabeled samples, and 22 requests for blood for the wrong patient. Near-miss events were five times more frequent than actual transfusion errors, and 68 percent of errors were detected before blood was issued. Sixty-one percent of events originated from patient areas, 35 percent from the blood bank, and 4 percent from the blood supplier or other hospitals. Repeat collection was required for 1 of every 94 samples, and 1 in 346 requests for blood components was incorrect. Education of nurses and alterations to blood bank forms were not by themselves effective in reducing severe errors. An artifactual 50-percent reduction in the number of errors reported was noted during a 6-month period when two chief members of the event-reporting team were on temporary leave.
Conclusion:
The MERS-TM allowed the recognition and analysis of errors, determination of patterns of errors, and monitoring for changes in frequency after corrective action was implemented. Although no permanent injury resulted from the 819 events, innovative mechanisms must be designed to prevent these errors, instead of relying on faulty informal checks to capture errors after they occur.
Insights
A no-fault medical-event reporting system for transfusion medicine (MERS-TM) captured 819 transfusion errors and near-misses, identifying critical patient safety issues. Innovative error prevention is needed, as current methods are insufficient.
Area of Science:
- Transfusion Medicine
- Patient Safety
- Medical Error Analysis
Background:
- Medical errors contribute to serious adverse events in transfusion medicine.
- A no-fault medical-event reporting system for transfusion medicine (MERS-TM) was developed to capture and analyze transfusion-related errors and near-misses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of the MERS-TM in identifying the frequency and patterns of transfusion-related errors.
- To assess the types and origins of errors within the transfusion process.
Main Methods:
- A prospective audit of transfusion-related errors was conducted over 19 months.
- The MERS-TM was utilized to record events and near-misses.
- Data analysis focused on error frequency, patterns, and severity.
Main Results:
- 819 events and near-misses were recorded, with a median of 51 per month.
- 61 events (7.4%) were potentially life-threatening, including sample collection/labeling errors and incorrect blood requests.
- Near-misses were five times more frequent than errors, and 68% were detected before blood issuance.
Conclusions:
- The MERS-TM effectively identified and analyzed transfusion errors, revealing patterns and enabling monitoring.
- Despite no permanent injuries from recorded events, current error-detection mechanisms are inadequate.
- Innovative strategies are required to prevent transfusion errors proactively.
Related Concept Videos
Blood Transfusion and Agglutination
History
The history of blood transfusion dates back to the 17th century, when early attempts were made in animals. In 1818 James Blundell, a British doctor, performed the first successful human blood transfusion. Later in 1900, Karl...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Types of Reports I: Hand-off Report
Following are the key components and categories of hand-off reports:
Purpose and Process:
Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report
Purposes:
In the healthcare industry, reports play a crucial role in documenting incidents within an agency. The primary objective of these reports is to ensure patient safety, uphold the...
Blood Transfusion
Blood Transfusion Overview
A blood transfusion is a medical procedure used to replace blood lost due to injury, surgery, or to treat conditions such as anemia or cancer. During a transfusion, donor blood is...
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios

