Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hypothesis testing and earthquake prediction.

D D Jackson1

  • 1Southern California Earthquake Center, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1567, USA.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|April 30, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The psychosomatic factors in ulcerative colitis.

Psychosomatic medicine·2010
Same author

The use of d-desoxyephedrine in neuropsychiatry.

Texas reports on biology and medicine·2010
Same author

The Determination of Intestinal Bacteria in Milk.

American journal of public hygiene·2009
Same author

The Determination of the Typhoid Bacillus in Infected Water and Milk.

American journal of public hygiene·2009
Same author

Experiments on Putrescibility Tests for Sewage and Sewage Effluent.

American journal of public hygiene·2009
Same author

Laboratory Section: LIVER BROTH.

Journal. American Public Health Association·2009
Same journal

The TaMYB55-TaSnRK1α1-TabZIP9 module confers heat stress tolerance in wheat.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Superstatistics approach to turbulent circulation fluctuations.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

A molecular timescale for evolution of cobamide biosynthesis.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Pierre Chambon, a pioneer of molecular biology and gene regulation in eukaryotes.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Granulosa cell glycogen fuels the avascular corpus luteum.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Synthetic essentiality of TRAIL/TNFSF10 in VHL-deficient renal cell carcinoma.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
See all related articles

Formulating testable earthquake prediction hypotheses in advance is crucial for validation. Rigorous testing requires specifying conditional rate density or probabilities, and comparing predictions against a null hypothesis for reliable assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Geophysics
  • Seismology
  • Earthquake Science

Background:

  • Earthquake prediction requires rigorous validation of proposed methods.
  • Assessing prediction accuracy necessitates clearly defined hypotheses and testing protocols.
  • Understanding 'normal' seismic behavior is essential for identifying increased earthquake probability periods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline requirements for testing earthquake prediction hypotheses.
  • To emphasize the importance of advance hypothesis formulation for method validation.
  • To propose methods for testing earthquake predictions against observed seismic activity.

Main Methods:

  • Specifying conditional rate density (probability per unit time, area, and magnitude).
  • Defining probabilities for specified intervals of time, space, and magnitude.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Testing hypotheses by comparing actual earthquakes to predictions using statistical methods (e.g., likelihood scores, likelihood ratios).
  • Main Results:

    • Three primary testing approaches are identified: comparing counts, comparing likelihood scores, and comparing likelihood ratios against a null hypothesis.
    • Self-consistency tests (comparing counts or likelihood scores) are distinguished from direct hypothesis comparison (likelihood ratio).
    • Predictions lacking probabilistic statements are difficult to test rigorously.

    Conclusions:

    • Advance formulation of testable earthquake prediction hypotheses is vital due to long validation times.
    • Robust testing requires probabilistic statements and comparison with a null hypothesis representing normal seismic behavior.
    • The proposed testing framework enables objective evaluation of earthquake prediction models.