Perceptions of amputation before and after gunpowder

Woodall's remark on limb amputation, in 1617, that "it is no small presumption to Dismember the Image of God", reflected lingering doubts attributable to widespread ancient beliefs or taboos which, at least during the early historic period, shunned elective amputations completely. Death was preferred to operative destruction of the body's integrity, even when societies were aware of traumatic, disease-induced and legal amputations, eventually to be accepted and managed rationally. Deep-rooted resistance to planned dismemberment became unbalanced by the malevolent wounds of gunshot missiles which contrasted vividly with cold steel and blunt injuries of earlier warfare. Massive soft tissue destruction, bone comminution and, above all, embedded missiles and clothing posed perplexing complications for both patients and surgeons, often causing gangrene and death. Finally despite resultant deformity, amputation was recognised as a means of preserving life. It is maintained the philosophical perception, believing it is better to live with three limbs than to die with four, gained acceptance due to the persuasive influence of gunpowder on battlefields and in battle-ships. Notwithstanding, until carbolised catgut ligatures were employed amputation remained a hazardous procedurep it persists as a repugnant operation of last resort.