Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Chagas, the logic and the discovery].

F Delaporte1

  • 1Universidade da Picardia.

Historia, Ciencias, Saude--Manguinhos
|November 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Chance and error, not pure logic, underpinned Carlos Chagas

Related Experiment Videos

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The discovery of the vector of Robles disease.

Parassitologia·2010
Same author

Chagas today.

Parassitologia·2006
Same author

Romana's sign.

Journal of the history of biology·2001
Same author

[Not Available].

Cadernos de historia e saude·1992
Same author

Theories of osteogenesis in the eighteenth century.

Journal of the history of biology·1983
Same author

[Neonatal primary herpes infection].

Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie·1980

Area of Science:

  • Historical epistemology
  • Medical history
  • History of science

Background:

  • Carlos Chagas' discovery of a new disease entity.
  • Review of Chagas' research pathways.
  • Examination of chance and error in scientific discovery.

Discussion:

  • Chagas' discovery is analyzed through the lens of historical epistemology.
  • The article questions the "official version" of the discovery narrative.
  • Contradiction between historical progression and strict logical deduction is highlighted.

Key Insights:

  • Chance and error played a fundamental role in Chagas' discovery.
  • The established narrative of the discovery may not align with the historical reality.
  • Scientific progress can be driven by non-linear, contingent factors.

Outlook:

  • Re-evaluation of historical scientific narratives.
  • Understanding the role of serendipity in scientific breakthroughs.
  • Further research into the epistemology of scientific discovery.