Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pseudoneglect and the cross-over effect.

L Rueckert1, A Deravanesian, D Baboorian

  • 1Department of Psychology, Northeastern Illinois University, 5500 N. St. Louis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60625, USA. l-rueckert@neiu.edu

Neuropsychologia
|October 20, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Individual differences in cognitive performance due to right hemisphere arousal.

Laterality·2004
Same author

Individual differences in callosal efficiency: correlation with attention.

Brain and cognition·1999
Same author

Secretin induces the apical insertion of aquaporin-1 water channels in rat cholangiocytes.

The American journal of physiology·1999
Same author

Sustained attention deficits in patients with lesions of posterior cortex.

Neuropsychologia·1998
Same author

Sustained attention deficits in patients with right frontal lesions.

Neuropsychologia·1996
Same author

Further evidence that the callosum is involved in sustaining attention.

Neuropsychologia·1996
Same journal

Prevalence and modulation of rat off-track head scanning on linear tracks: possible implications for representational and dynamic properties of hippocampal place cells.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Identifying networks within an fMRI multivariate searchlight analysis.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Modulating sentence comprehension in people with aphasia through anodal tDCS: A double-blind randomized cross-over study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Deficient processing of regularity violations during visuospatial neglect: a visual mismatch negativity study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Seeing is believing: mental imagery amplifies moral, emotional, and motivational responding to mentally constructed hypothetical events.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

From Past Recall to Future Projection: What Does Verb Tense Production Reveal About Mental Time Travel in Alzheimer's disease?

Neuropsychologia·2026
See all related articles

Normal participants exhibit a cross-over effect in line bisection tasks, but only on perceptual tasks, not manual ones. This finding offers insights into right hemispheric attention mechanisms.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Perception

Background:

  • Left hemi-neglect patients show a 'cross-over' effect in line bisection.
  • Normal participants may show leftward bias on long lines due to right hemisphere attention.
  • The role of perceptual versus motor factors in this effect is unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the cross-over effect in normal participants.
  • To differentiate between perceptual and motor contributions to the cross-over effect.
  • To explore implications for models of right hemispheric attention.

Main Methods:

  • Line bisection task (manual).
  • Landmark task (perceptual).
  • Studies involved modifications to tasks and participant groups.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No cross-over effect observed in the initial line bisection or Landmark tasks.
  • Improvements in the Landmark task led to a significant cross-over effect.
  • No cross-over effect found in the traditional line bisection task, even with modifications.

Conclusions:

  • Normal participants demonstrate a cross-over effect in purely perceptual tasks.
  • The cross-over effect is not evident in manual line bisection tasks involving motor components.
  • Findings suggest distinct roles for perception and motor action in spatial attention biases.