Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Reply to Ann Bradshaw.

Peter Allmark

    Journal of Medical Ethics
    |February 1, 1996
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study argues that while Bradshaw

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Factors influencing the decision to accept or decline aortic valve replacement for asymptomatic aortic stenosis: a nested longitudinal qualitative substudy of the EASY-AS randomised trial.

    BMJ open·2026
    Same author

    Living beyond expectations: a qualitative study into the experience of long-term survivors with pleural mesothelioma and their carers.

    BMJ open respiratory research·2022
    Same author

    Technology-Facilitated Abuse in Intimate Relationships: A Scoping Review.

    Trauma, violence & abuse·2022
    Same author

    Integrating physical activity into the treatment of depression in adults: A qualitative enquiry.

    Health & social care in the community·2021
    Same author

    Advanced practice nurses' experiences and well-being: Baseline demographics from a cohort study.

    Journal of nursing management·2020
    Same author

    Clarity, conviction and coherence supports buy-in to positive youth sexual health services: focused results from a realist evaluation.

    BMC health services research·2019
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Area of Science:

    • Ethics
    • Moral Philosophy

    Background:

    • The initial paper posited that an ethics of care requires specific guidance on 'how' and 'what' to care for to possess normative and descriptive content.
    • Bradshaw's approach offers such specifications, seemingly fulfilling the criteria for a substantive ethics of care.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate Bradshaw's ethics of care against the criteria established in the original paper.
    • To analyze the broader implications of Bradshaw's approach for the definition of 'ethics of care'.
    • To identify and discuss philosophical and historical issues within Bradshaw's framework.

    Main Methods:

    • Conceptual analysis of ethical theories.
    • Comparative review of Bradshaw's approach with the author's original framework.
    • Identification of philosophical and historical critiques.

    Main Results:

    • Bradshaw's approach provides the necessary specification for an ethics of care, thus possessing normative and descriptive content.
    • All ethical approaches, in a broad sense, define 'what' and 'how' to care, aligning with the original paper's broader definition.
    • Specific philosophical and historical problems are identified in Bradshaw's ethics of care.

    Conclusions:

    • The original conclusion that an underspecified ethics of care lacks content is reinforced, not undermined, by Bradshaw's work.
    • Bradshaw's specific approach, despite its specifications, faces significant philosophical and historical challenges.
    • The study reaffirms the importance of detailed specification within any ethics of care framework.
    Keywords:
    Bioethics and Professional Ethics

    Related Experiment Videos