Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Where do moral decisions come from?

Bette-Jane Crigger

    The Hastings Center Report
    |January 1, 1996
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Conflicts--and consensus--about conflicts of interest in medicine.

    Narrative inquiry in bioethics·2014
    Same author

    The honesty effect.

    The Hastings Center report·2012
    Same author

    Report of the AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs: professionalism in the use of social media.

    The Journal of clinical ethics·2011
    Same author

    Should health care professionals Google patients or family members?

    PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation·2011
    Same author

    A physician's role following a breach of electronic health information.

    The Journal of clinical ethics·2010
    Same author

    E-medicine: policy to shape the future of health care.

    The Hastings Center report·2006
    Same journal

    Harm Reduction as an Alternative to Mandated Drug Treatment.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Rethinking Mandated Drug Treatment: Why Expanding Freedom Requires Structural Drug Policy Reform.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Banning Gender-Affirming Treatment for Minors: The Supreme Court Speaks.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Making the Move to a Learning System of Research Ethics.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Musical Performance and Biomedical Human Enhancement: Ethnographic Perspectives on Bioethical Questions.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Transformed but Not Cured: The Ethics of Describing Gene-Editing Therapy for Sickle Cell Disease.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    See all related articles

    Theory is viewed as an imaginative construction, not an objective world account. Moral universals stem from dynamic, human-centered processes, not abstract rules.

    Area of Science:

    • Philosophy of Science
    • Moral Philosophy
    • Social Theory

    Background:

    • The abstract discusses Mark Johnson's perspective on theory as an imaginative construction.
    • It highlights a common theme across four books regarding moral universals.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the nature of theory as a dynamic, intersubjective construal rather than an objective account.
    • To examine the origins of moral universals, linking them to embodied human processes.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of theoretical frameworks presented in four books.
    • Interpretation of philosophical arguments concerning the nature of knowledge and morality.

    Main Results:

    • Theory is characterized as a dynamic, intersubjective construction.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachBioethics and Professional EthicsImagination and Ethical Ideals (Tierney, N.L.)Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics (Johnson, M.)The Hungry Soul: Eating and the Perfecting of Our Nature (Kass, L.R.)The Moral Sense (Wilson, J.Q.)

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Moral universals are intrinsically linked to embodied human processes and dynamic systems.

    • Conclusions:

    • Emphasizes the imaginative and construal aspects of theory.
    • Asserts that moral universals are rooted in the human form and its processes, challenging disembodied rule-based ethics.