Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A reply to Spicker.

Michael Loughlin

    Health Care Analysis : HCA : Journal of Health Philosophy and Policy
    |June 1, 1993
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Professor Spicker criticizes welfare using flawed views on poverty and morality. His arguments are inconsistent and highlight the unrealistic nature of new right ideology.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Inspecting the links: Knowledge, evidence and value in healthcare.

    Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2024
    Same author

    Nanoarchitectonics of Bactericidal Coatings Based on CaCO<sub>3</sub>-Nanosilver Hybrids.

    ACS applied bio materials·2024
    Same author

    Editorial for the 2023 philosophy thematic edition: Treating the whole person: Philosophical health.

    Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2023
    Same author

    Philosophical health: Unveiling the patient's personal philosophy with a person-centred method of dialogue.

    Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2023
    Same author

    How similar is the antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles coated with different capping agents?

    RSC advances·2023
    Same author

    Vaterite vectors for the protection, storage and release of silver nanoparticles.

    Journal of colloid and interface science·2022

    Area of Science:

    • Social Sciences
    • Political Science
    • Philosophy

    Background:

    • Critiques of welfare policy often rely on distinct moral and prudential arguments.
    • The ideology of the 'new right' frequently presents radical policy proposals.
    • Understanding the philosophical underpinnings of policy critiques is essential.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze Professor Spicker's critique of welfare policy.
    • To examine the philosophical assumptions, specifically the Kantian distinction between morality and prudence, underlying Spicker's arguments.
    • To evaluate the coherence and implications of Spicker's position in relation to poverty and state-funded education.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical analysis of Spicker's arguments.
    • Critique of the premises regarding the causes of poverty.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachHealth Care and Public Health

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of the consistency between moral and prudential claims and policy recommendations.

    • Main Results:

    • Spicker's prudential critique of welfare is based on an oversimplified and offensive view of poverty.
    • Spicker's moral premise is unsupported and contradicts his call for state-funded education.
    • The critique exemplifies the anti-realist and utopian characteristics of new right ideology.

    Conclusions:

    • Spicker's welfare critique lacks a sound philosophical and empirical foundation.
    • The analysis reveals significant inconsistencies within Spicker's proposed policy framework.
    • The study underscores the ideological nature of certain critiques of social welfare programs.