Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cloning: revisiting an old debate.

Allen D Verhey

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
    |September 1, 1994
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Early cloning debates highlight enduring ethical questions in reproductive technologies. Philosophical differences on freedom, personhood, and parenthood inform cautious progress in embryo-splitting research.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Scripture and medical ethics.

    Bioethics forum·1992
    Same author

    Talking of God -- but with whom?

    The Hastings Center report·1990
    Same journal

    On the Dangers of Cancer Exceptionalism in Pain Medicine.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    Suck It Up and Stay on the Grind: Ethical Considerations Surrounding Trust, Chronic Pain, and the American Workplace.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    <i>Morbus Mediterraneus</i>: A Cultural Alibi for an Unequal Pain Burden.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    Beyond Words: A Philosophical Analysis of the Linguistic Refractoriness of Chronic Pain.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    When "Good-Enough" Treatment Is Not Good Enough: Epistemic Injustice, Pain-Related Motivational Deficit, and Epistemic Deflection in the Treatment of Gynecological Pain.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    The Silent Struggle: A Woman's Journey Through Pain.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Reproductive Technologies
    • Philosophy of Science

    Background:

    • A 25-year-old debate on cloning, though focused differently, offers insights into current reproductive technologies and research ethics.
    • Key participants Paul Ramsey and Joseph Fletcher engaged in fundamental philosophical disagreements.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To elucidate enduring ethical issues in reproductive technologies by examining a historical cloning debate.
    • To suggest a broader agenda for contemporary cloning discussions and guide cautious development in embryo-splitting.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical analysis of historical arguments.
    • Comparative examination of ethical viewpoints on freedom, good vs. evil, embodiment, personhood, human-nature relations, and parenthood.
    Keywords:
    Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchGenetics and Reproduction

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The historical debate revealed core disagreements on fundamental ethical concepts relevant to modern reproductive technologies.
    • Differences in perspectives on personhood, embodiment, and the meaning of parenthood are central to the cloning discourse.

    Conclusions:

    • The historical cloning debate provides a valuable framework for understanding current ethical challenges in reproductive science.
    • A cautious approach to embryo-splitting is warranted, informed by the deep philosophical considerations raised in past ethical discussions.