Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Principlism and its alleged competitors.

Tom L Beauchamp

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
    |September 1, 1995
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Robert Veatch's early career in bioethics, contributions to the field, and career at Georgetown University.

    Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2022
    Same author

    Common Morality Principles in Biomedical Ethics: Responses to Critics.

    Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2021
    Same author

    The Origins and Drafting of the <i>Belmont Report</i>.

    Perspectives in biology and medicine·2021
    Same author

    On Conditions that Compromise Autonomous Choice.

    The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2020
    Same author

    Lucky Me: The Amiable and Weighty Influences on My Career.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2020
    Same author

    Response to Commentaries.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2020

    Bioethics principles face criticism, leading to new methods like Impartial Rule Theory, Casuistry, and Virtue Ethics. These approaches complement, rather than oppose, existing principle-based frameworks in ethical decision-making.

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Moral Philosophy

    Background:

    • Since the late 1980s, principle-based frameworks in bioethics have faced criticism.
    • Alternative and substitute methods have been proposed to address these criticisms.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore emerging bioethical frameworks.
    • To analyze the relationship between new ethical approaches and traditional principle-based accounts.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of contemporary bioethical theories.
    • Analysis of Impartial Rule Theory, Casuistry, and Virtue Ethics.

    Main Results:

    • Several new bioethical accounts have emerged, including Impartial Rule Theory, Casuistry, and Virtue Ethics.
    • These diverse approaches are presented as alternatives to principle-based methods.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachBioethics and Professional Ethics

    Related Experiment Videos

    Conclusions:

    • Despite being presented as rivals, Impartial Rule Theory, Casuistry, and Virtue Ethics are consistent with principle-based bioethics.
    • These newer methods should not be viewed as adversaries to established principle-based frameworks.