Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Embryos created for research purposes.

Dena S Davis

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
    |December 1, 1995
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Hurdles of trying to avoid low-value care: two cheers for Choosing Wisely.

    BMJ evidence-based medicine·2025
    Same author

    Response to Stanley Terman: Too little, too late.

    Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2024
    Same author

    Genomic testing and patient rights.

    Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2024
    Same author

    B'rit shalom: a Jewish ritual alternative to newborn male circumcision.

    International journal of impotence research·2022
    Same author

    Death in a Cold Climate: Medical Aid in Dying in Vermont.

    The Hastings Center report·2022
    Same author

    Living with Alzheimer Disease and Other Types of Dementia: Stories from Caregivers.

    Narrative inquiry in bioethics·2021
    Same journal

    Coming to America: Bioethical Training at the Kennedy Institute of Ethics and the Establishment of Medical Ethics in Germany.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    A Reply to Bernstein, Jayaram, and Hutler's "Assessing the Liberty-Based Case Against Pandemic Lockdowns".

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    Assessing the Liberty-Based Case Against Pandemic Lockdowns.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    Relational Autonomy in Nonideal Medical Decision-Making.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    Ambiguous Invitations: Nonmaleficence, Uncertainty Attitudes and Public Health Policy.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    Editor's Note, June 2025.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    See all related articles

    Creating embryos for research sparks ethical debate. Distinguishing between "spare" and "research" embryos is challenging, with symbolic arguments about respecting human life being paramount.

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Embryology
    • Medical Ethics

    Background:

    • The creation of embryos for research purposes is a contentious issue.
    • Ethical distinctions between using "spare" embryos and creating embryos specifically for research are debated.
    • Symbolic arguments regarding respect for human life are central to the controversy.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the ethical criticisms surrounding the creation of embryos for research.
    • To analyze the symbolic arguments against embryo research, drawing parallels with the abortion debate.
    • To propose a reframed question to facilitate a more constructive ethical discussion.

    Main Methods:

    • Conceptual analysis of ethical arguments.
    • Application of Ronald Dworkin's philosophical framework from "Life's Dominion".
    Keywords:
    Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchGenetics and ReproductionHuman Embryo Research PanelLife's Dominion: An Argument About Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom (Dworkin, R.D.)National Institutes of Health

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative ethical reasoning regarding "spare" versus "research" embryos.

    • Main Results:

    • A clear ethical distinction between "spare" and "research" embryos is difficult to establish.
    • Symbolic considerations of human life's sanctity form the strongest argument against creating research embryos.
    • The debate can be advanced by focusing on whether creating research embryos diminishes communal respect for human life.

    Conclusions:

    • The creation of embryos for research poses significant ethical challenges.
    • Symbolic value and respect for human life are key ethical considerations.
    • Reframing the debate around the impact on communal respect for life can foster more productive discourse.