Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Current and future issues in assisted reproduction.

LeRoy Walters

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
    |December 1, 1996
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Menopausal Hormone Labels Should Rely on Evidence, Not Opinion.

    JAMA·2026
    Same author

    Governing Heritable Human Genome Editing: A Textual History and a Proposal for the Future.

    The CRISPR journal·2021
    Same author

    In support of mitochondrial replacement therapy.

    Nature medicine·2019
    Same author

    Genetics and bioethics: how our thinking has changed since 1969.

    Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2012
    Same author

    Paul Braune confronts the National Socialists' "euthanasia" program.

    Holocaust and genocide studies·2010
    Same author

    Monitoring the randomized trials of the Women's Health Initiative: the experience of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board.

    Clinical trials (London, England)·2007
    Same journal

    Coming to America: Bioethical Training at the Kennedy Institute of Ethics and the Establishment of Medical Ethics in Germany.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    A Reply to Bernstein, Jayaram, and Hutler's "Assessing the Liberty-Based Case Against Pandemic Lockdowns".

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    Assessing the Liberty-Based Case Against Pandemic Lockdowns.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    Relational Autonomy in Nonideal Medical Decision-Making.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    Ambiguous Invitations: Nonmaleficence, Uncertainty Attitudes and Public Health Policy.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    Editor's Note, June 2025.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    See all related articles

    New reproductive technologies like assisted insemination, in vitro fertilization, and surrogate motherhood have emerged. Ethical debates surrounding these advancements continue, with future complexities anticipated.

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Reproductive Medicine
    • Public Policy

    Background:

    • The late 20th century witnessed unprecedented advancements in reproductive technologies.
    • These innovations include assisted insemination, in vitro fertilization, and surrogate motherhood.
    • Society is navigating the ethical and policy implications of these reproductive revolutions.

    Observation:

    • The essay reviews ethical and public-policy discussions on key reproductive techniques and arrangements.
    • It distinguishes three phases in the normative debate over the past 25 years.
    • Ambiguities and characteristics of the ongoing ethical discourse are examined.

    Findings:

    • Assisted insemination, in vitro fertilization, and surrogate motherhood present complex ethical challenges.
    Keywords:
    American Fertility SocietyEthics Advisory BoardGenetics and Reproduction

    Related Experiment Videos

  • The ethical debate has evolved through distinct phases over the last quarter-century.
  • Persistent ambiguities characterize the discourse on reproductive ethics.
  • Implications:

    • Understanding past debates is crucial for addressing current ethical dilemmas in reproduction.
    • Anticipating future ethical issues in reproductive medicine is essential for proactive policy-making.
    • Continued dialogue is needed to navigate the evolving landscape of reproductive technologies and arrangements.