Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Emergency services: status categorization is dynamic.

A P Klippel

    Hospitals
    |July 16, 1975
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Hospitals should self-categorize emergency capabilities to avoid rigid external guidelines. Status categorization offers a flexible alternative for evaluating diverse hospital emergency readiness.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A hospital-based helicopter service: will it fly?

    Annals of emergency medicine·1980
    Same author

    The argument for passenger restraints in automobiles.

    JACEP·1979
    Same author

    The IV in readiness--a mixed blessing?

    JACEP·1978
    Same author

    The use of silver-zinc-allantoin powder for the prehospital treatment of burns.

    JACEP·1977
    Same author

    Emergency department staffing to improve patient management.

    JACEP·1977
    Same author

    The need for a mandatory seat belt law.

    Missouri medicine·1974
    Same journal

    The hospital and education.

    Hospitals·2014
    Same journal

    Three guides to finding a good architect.

    Hospitals·2010
    Same journal

    Who will pay hospital bills for postwar patients?

    Hospitals·2010
    Same journal

    DEVELOPING a rural community hospital.

    Hospitals·2010
    Same journal

    Personnel organization no substitute for good personnel relations.

    Hospitals·2010
    Same journal

    Neonatal crying; a study of its incidence, causes and control.

    Hospitals·2010
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Emergency Medicine
    • Healthcare Administration
    • Public Health Policy

    Background:

    • Hospitals face potential imposition of rigid external guidelines for emergency capability categorization.
    • Current categorization methods may not adequately reflect dynamic hospital capacities.
    • Ineffective approaches include ignoring the issue or overly simplifying guidelines.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore alternative methods for evaluating hospital emergency capabilities.
    • To advocate for proactive hospital self-categorization of emergency services.
    • To highlight the limitations of externally imposed, rigid categorization systems.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of existing hospital categorization frameworks.
    • Evaluation of the "status categorization" model.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative assessment of different approaches to emergency capability assessment.

    • Main Results:

    • Self-categorization allows for tailored evaluation of hospital emergency services.
    • Status categorization offers a dynamic approach, considering time-of-day variations.
    • Rigid, externally imposed guidelines may not be suitable for all healthcare facilities.

    Conclusions:

    • Proactive hospital self-categorization is preferable to externally imposed systems.
    • Status categorization presents a viable, flexible alternative for assessing emergency readiness.
    • Effective categorization requires acknowledging the dynamic nature of hospital capabilities.