Gene therapy, human nature and the churches

Area of Science:

• Bioethics
• Medical Ethics
• Human Genetics

Background:

• Scientific advancements, particularly in genetics, influence societal attitudes.
• Human nature, rooted in the cerebral cortex, remains distinct and requires safeguarding.
• Ethical frameworks must acknowledge empirical realities while preserving human capacities.

Purpose of the Study:

• To analyze the ethical implications of genetic technologies on human nature and parental duties.
• To address the concept of a "right" to an unmanipulated genome.
• To examine the role of religious institutions in guiding moral reasoning regarding reproduction.

Main Methods:

• Philosophical analysis of ethical principles.
• Examination of the interplay between scientific progress and human values.
• Critique of religious authority in moral decision-making.

Main Results:

• The language of rights is inappropriate for discussing genome inheritance.
• Parents have a fundamental duty to protect and serve the interests of their potential child.
• Medical professionals have a duty to assist parents within defined ethical boundaries.

Conclusions:

• Genetic technologies do not change fundamental human nature or capacities like compassion and justice.
• Religious institutions should support, rather than overrule, individual conscience in moral reasoning.
• Emphasis should be placed on ethical reasoning and fostering a tender conscience in reproductive decisions.