Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Case vignette: premature surrender.

Hindi T Mermelstein, George J Annas, Robert J Levine

    Ethics & Behavior
    |January 1, 1992
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Transplantation and Immortality: A Selective History of Boston University's Center for Health Law, Ethics & Human Rights.

    American journal of law & medicine·2025
    Same author

    Sports Participation by Athletes With Cardiovascular Disease.

    Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2024
    Same author

    Human Rights in Hospitals: an End to Routine Shackling.

    Journal of general internal medicine·2024
    Same author

    (Re)criminalizing Abortion: Returning to the Political with Stories.

    The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2023
    Same author

    Canada Welcomes Tundra's Immortality Project to Prevent Death (<i>Wall Street Journal</i>, July 13, 2060, p. D1, "Travel and Leisure" Section).

    The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2023
    Same author

    Preventing the Slide down the Slippery Slope from Assisted Suicide to Euthanasia While Protecting the Rights of People with Disabilities Who Are "Not Dead Yet."

    The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2023

    A 57-year-old man with thymoma requested "do not resuscitate" status post-surgery despite a good prognosis. This case explores respecting patient autonomy versus life-saving interventions in complex medical situations.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Oncology
    • Critical Care Medicine

    Background:

    • A 57-year-old previously healthy male underwent surgery for a low-grade malignant thymoma.
    • The patient had a documented living will and renewed it after his cancer diagnosis.

    Observation:

    • Postoperatively, the patient experienced cardiac arrhythmia and bronchospasm due to tissue damage.
    • Medical consensus indicated these were temporary issues, but weaning from ventilatory support was challenging.
    • The patient and family insisted on 'do not resuscitate' status, citing the living will, despite a high probability of successful recovery.

    Findings:

    • The patient has an excellent prognosis for a long and productive life post-thymoma treatment.
    • Resuscitation interventions are likely to be effective if life-threatening arrhythmias occur.
    Keywords:
    Death and EuthanasiaProfessional Patient Relationship

    Related Experiment Videos

  • The core conflict involves respecting patient autonomy versus the medical team's ethical obligation to preserve life.

    • Implications:

    • This case highlights the ethical dilemmas in end-of-life care decisions when patient wishes conflict with perceived medical benefit.
    • It necessitates a careful review of protocols for managing patient autonomy, advance directives, and critical care interventions.
    • The situation prompts discussion on how healthcare providers should navigate complex ethical scenarios involving patient-reported wishes and survival probabilities.