Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A methodological error in bioethics.

J-M Nores

    Journal International De Bioethique = International Journal of Bioethics
    |June 1, 1992
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study identifies a reasoning flaw in medical ethics research where unrelated arguments are used to support moral positions. Such flawed reasoning, seen in vaccination and animal experiment debates, undermines ethical discourse.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [Adrenal insufficiency after treatment of nasal polyposis].

    Annales d'oto-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico faciale : bulletin de la Societe d'oto-laryngologie des hopitaux de Paris·2004
    Same journal

    THE USE OF THE NOTION OF HUMANITY IN FRENCH LAW.

    Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics·2015
    Same journal

    [Euthanasia and assisted suicide].

    Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics·2015
    Same journal

    [Selected ethical issues in oncogenetics].

    Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics·2015
    Same journal

    [The use and storage of stem cells and cord blood: French and English law comparative approach].

    Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics·2015
    Same journal

    [The legal status of elements and products of the human body: object or subject of law?].

    Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics·2015
    Same journal

    [Embryo research: the risks of eugenic drifts].

    Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics·2015
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Philosophy of Science

    Background:

    • Studies in medical ethics sometimes employ flawed reasoning.
    • This flaw involves using arguments unrelated to the moral position being defended.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To define and illustrate a specific logical fallacy in medical ethics arguments.
    • To highlight the importance of using appropriate types of arguments in ethical discussions.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of case studies in medical ethics.
    • Examination of arguments used in ethical debates concerning vaccination, animal experimentation, vegetarianism, and Jehovah's Witnesses' stances.

    Main Results:

    • Identified a recurring flaw where non-moral arguments (e.g., scientific) are incorrectly used to support moral claims.
    Keywords:
    Bioethics and Professional Ethics

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Demonstrated this flaw across various ethical issues.

    • Conclusions:

    • Arguments for moral positions must be moral, legal, or metaphysical in nature.
    • Scientific arguments are inappropriate for resolving inherently moral questions.