Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bayer revisited.

Patricia Illingworth

    Bioethics
    |January 1, 1992
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This paper clarifies disagreements regarding liberalism and its impact on AIDS public health policy. It highlights fundamental differences in interpreting liberalism and its policy implications for public health.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Solidarity for global health.

    Bioethics·2012
    Same author

    The ethical implications of the social determinants of health: a global renaissance for bioethics.

    Bioethics·2009
    Same author

    Orphan drug policies: implications for the United States, Canada, and developing countries.

    Health law journal·2006
    Same author

    The dilemma of intellectual property rights for pharmaceuticals: the tension between ensuring access of the poor to medicines and committing to international agreements.

    Developing world bioethics·2003
    Same author

    Trust: the scarcest of medical resources.

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2002
    Same author

    Private Acts, Social Consequences by Ronald Bayer (New York: Free Press; 1989).

    Bioethics·1990
    Same journal

    Transhumanism Without Transindividuation in the Age Without Epochality: Stiegler, Vice, and Radical Human Enhancement.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Between Safeguard and Constraint: Navigating Patient Autonomy in Protective Laws for Medical Assistance in Dying.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Bioethics of Space Exploration: Life, Risk, and Responsibility Beyond Earth.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    The Concept of Harm in Medical Ethics.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    On the Destruction and Humanitarianisation of the Health System in Gaza and the Need for a Biopolitical Bioethics.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Shaping Future Children, Sex Selection, and "Normal" Human Capacities.

    Bioethics·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Public Health Policy
    • Political Philosophy
    • Bioethics

    Background:

    • A debate exists concerning the role of liberal emphasis on privacy rights in AIDS public health policy.
    • Bayer's views on liberalism and its relation to public health policy have been subject to interpretation.
    • This work addresses a specific critique of Bayer's stance on privacy rights and AIDS policy.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To clarify the author's position in response to Bayer's critique.
    • To delineate fundamental disagreements regarding the interpretation of liberalism in public health policy.
    • To explore the implications of different liberal philosophies for AIDS policy.

    Main Methods:

    • Review and analysis of academic discourse and published viewpoints.
    Keywords:
    Health Care and Public HealthPrivate Acts, Social Consequences (Bayer, R.)

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Philosophical interpretation of political concepts (liberalism).
  • Examination of policy implications within the context of public health crises.

    • Main Results:

    • Bayer denies holding a negative thesis on privacy rights' impact on AIDS policy.
    • Bayer asserts his position is sympathetic to certain versions of liberalism.
    • The core disagreement lies in the definition of liberalism and its public policy consequences for AIDS.

    Conclusions:

    • The divergence stems from fundamental differences in understanding liberalism's philosophical underpinnings.
    • These differing interpretations have significant implications for shaping AIDS public health policy.
    • Further discourse is needed to reconcile or understand these contrasting perspectives on liberalism and health policy.