Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rationing fairly: programmatic considerations.

Norman Daniels

    Bioethics
    |April 1, 1993
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Should Lack of Social Support Prevent Access to Organ Transplantation?

    The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2019
    Same author

    A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding Variation in Social Support Requirements and Implications for Access to Transplantation in the United States.

    Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.)·2019
    Same author

    Role of the Courts in the Progressive Realization of the Right to Health: Between the Threat and the Promise of Judicialization in Mexico.

    Health systems and reform·2019
    Same author

    Combining A4R and MCDA in priority setting for health.

    Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E·2018
    Same author

    The art of priority setting.

    Lancet (London, England)·2018
    Same author

    How important is social support in determining patients' suitability for transplantation? Results from a National Survey of Transplant Clinicians.

    Journal of medical ethics·2018
    Same journal

    Surrogacy and the Moral Significance of Gestation: Reassessing Procreative Responsibilities.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Capable, Unbearably Suffering, and Excluded: People With Mental Illness and the Ethics of Canada's Assisted-Dying Regime.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Transhumanism Without Transindividuation in the Age Without Epochality: Stiegler, Vice, and Radical Human Enhancement.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Between Safeguard and Constraint: Navigating Patient Autonomy in Protective Laws for Medical Assistance in Dying.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Bioethics of Space Exploration: Life, Risk, and Responsibility Beyond Earth.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    The Concept of Harm in Medical Ethics.

    Bioethics·2026
    See all related articles

    This study argues against a narrow focus on healthcare rationing. It suggests developing a universal rationing theory applicable across various sectors, including legal services and education, for more robust applied ethics.

    Area of Science:

    • Ethics
    • Health Economics
    • Public Policy

    Background:

    • Healthcare rationing presents complex ethical and resource allocation challenges.
    • Existing approaches to rationing often lack a broader theoretical framework.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To advocate for a comprehensive theory of rationing applicable beyond healthcare.
    • To demonstrate the interconnectedness of rationing problems across different societal domains.

    Main Methods:

    • Illustrative examples of rationing problems in legal services and education.
    • Comparative analysis of resource allocation principles.
    • Development of a generalized rationing theory.

    Main Results:

    • Healthcare rationing shares common principles with rationing in other sectors.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachHealth Care and Public HealthPhilosophical Approach

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Provincialism in healthcare rationing obscures broader ethical and economic connections.
  • A unified theory of rationing can strengthen applied ethics.

    • Conclusions:

    • A plea against narrow, sector-specific approaches to rationing.
    • Rationing theories should be developed from common problem types, independent of specific goods.
    • This approach serves as a foundation for serious work in applied ethics.