Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Toward a theory of process.

Law, Medicine & Health Care : a Publication of the American Society of Law & Medicine

|January 1, 1992

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Creating a responsible authorship culture in science: Anchoring authorship practices in principles of transparency, credit, and accountability.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

Need for harmonized terminology in cryopreservation to support reproducibility, regulation, and translation.

Cryobiology·2026

Same author

A framework for assessing the trustworthiness of scientific research findings.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

Revolutionizing Brain Research Using Portable MRI in Field Settings: Public Perspectives on the Ethical and Legal Challenges.

Neuroethics·2025

Same author

Expert Stakeholder Perspectives on Emerging Technology for Neuroimaging Research with Highly Portable MRI: The Need for Guidance on Ethical, Legal, and Societal Issues.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2025

Same author

INTRODUCTION: Revolutionizing Neuroimaging Research with Highly Portable MRI: Confronting Ethical and Legal Challenges.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2025

This study identifies a gap in procedural ethics for ethics committees and courts, proposing patient-centered process values to address bias and define their interrelationship. This framework enhances ethical decision-making in healthcare settings.

Area of Science:

Bioethics
Legal Studies
Health Policy

Background:

Current debates on ethics committees and courts lack procedural ethics.
This deficiency stems from an absence of a theory of process and process values.
Ethics committees are a crucial starting point for developing process theory.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a theory of process values, specifically a patient-centered process.
To identify ethically mandatory processes, particularly those addressing gender, racial, and economic bias.
To define the interrelationship between ethics committees and courts using the proposed patient-centered process.

Main Methods:

Analysis of existing debates on ethics committees and courts.
Development of a theoretical framework for patient-centered process values.

Keywords:

Analytical Approach Bioethics and Professional Ethics Legal Approach Professional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos

Application of the framework to the ethics committee-court relationship.

Main Results:

A proposed set of patient-centered process values, including substantive and independent values.
Identification of specific processes mandated by the need to address bias.
A derived model for the interrelationship between ethics committees and courts.

Conclusions:

A robust theory of process is needed to guide ethics committees and their court interactions.
Patient-centered process values offer a framework for ethical decision-making and addressing systemic bias.
Further development of process theory holds significant theoretical and practical potential for bioethics and legal contexts.