Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Instituting a research ethic: chilling and cautionary tales.

Philip Pettit

    Bioethics
    |April 1, 1992
    PubMed
    Summary

    Ethical review boards for human research are expanding but may be heading in the wrong direction. This analysis warns of potential issues and suggests necessary changes in ethical review practices.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A hard choice for Tomasello.

    The Behavioral and brain sciences·2020
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Research Ethics
    • Human Subject Protection

    Background:

    • Ethical review of human research is a rapidly growing field.
    • Existing institutions for ethical review are facing increasing scrutiny.
    • Concerns exist regarding the current trajectory of ethical review practices.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically examine the direction of ethical review for human research.
    • To identify potential negative consequences of current trends in ethical oversight.
    • To propose necessary modifications to the practice of ethical review.

    Main Methods:

    • Critical analysis of current ethical review frameworks.
    • Review of institutional practices in human research ethics.
    • Identification of emerging challenges and concerns.

    Main Results:

    • The field of ethical review is experiencing significant growth.
    • There are concerns about the institutionalization and direction of ethical review.
    • The current path may lead to unintended negative outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • A cautionary note is warranted regarding the future of ethical review.
    • Urgent changes are needed in the practice of ethical review to ensure its effectiveness.
    • Re-evaluation of institutional structures and practices is essential for responsible research conduct.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachBiomedical and Behavioral Research

    Related Experiment Videos