Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

QALYs, age and fairness.

Klemens Kappel, Peter Sandøe

    Bioethics
    |October 1, 1992
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The study argues that Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) are not unfairly biased against older individuals. Ethical frameworks suggest prioritizing younger people for life-saving resources due to greater potential life-years gained.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A pilot study on the effect of feed supplementation with magnesium oxide and magnesium aspartate on blood magnesium content and tail lesions in pigs under practical on-farm conditions.

    Porcine health management·2026
    Same author

    Management practices and biosecurity in hobby and companion pig holdings: A cross-sectional study in Denmark.

    Preventive veterinary medicine·2026
    Same author

    Fish welfare in a changing world: New developments and current challenges.

    Journal of fish biology·2026
    Same author

    Investigating dog and cat owners' uptake of pet health insurance and spending on veterinary treatment.

    The Veterinary record·2026
    Same author

    Feline obesity is associated with stronger owner attachment, while indoor confinement increases risk of obesity at an early age in domestic shorthaired cats.

    Frontiers in veterinary science·2026
    Same author

    Academic integrity across educational levels: Exploring students' engagement with grey-zone and non-compliant practices in four European countries.

    PloS one·2026
    Same journal

    Transhumanism Without Transindividuation in the Age Without Epochality: Stiegler, Vice, and Radical Human Enhancement.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Between Safeguard and Constraint: Navigating Patient Autonomy in Protective Laws for Medical Assistance in Dying.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Bioethics of Space Exploration: Life, Risk, and Responsibility Beyond Earth.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    The Concept of Harm in Medical Ethics.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    On the Destruction and Humanitarianisation of the Health System in Gaza and the Need for a Biopolitical Bioethics.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Shaping Future Children, Sex Selection, and "Normal" Human Capacities.

    Bioethics·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Health Economics
    • Bioethics
    • Public Health Policy

    Background:

    • Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) are widely used in healthcare resource allocation.
    • Concerns exist regarding potential age bias in QALY calculations.
    • Ethical considerations in distributing scarce life-saving resources are critical.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the fairness of QALYs concerning age bias.
    • To determine if QALYs unfairly disadvantage older populations.
    • To explore ethical justifications for prioritizing certain age groups for resource allocation.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of ethical frameworks, including equality and consequentialism.
    • Examination of the ageist bias within QALY calculations.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachHealth Care and Public HealthPhilosophical Approach

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Ethical argumentation on resource distribution based on age.

    • Main Results:

    • QALYs do not exhibit an unfair bias against older people.
    • Ethical considerations support prioritizing the young for life-saving resources.
    • Both equality (life-time view) and consequentialism (utility of resources) justify favoring the young.

    Conclusions:

    • No plausible case supports QALYs having an unfair bias against the elderly.
    • Ethical principles support favoring younger individuals for essential survival resources.
    • Resource allocation decisions should consider potential life-years and utility.