Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The architect and the bee: some reflections on postmortem pregnancy.

Hilda Lindemann Nelson

    Bioethics
    |July 1, 1994
    PubMed
    Summary

    Physicians generally lack a duty to sustain pregnancies after a woman's death. Ethical considerations and the principle of bodily autonomy suggest postmortem pregnancy is not medically or ethically required.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same journal

    Slow Codes, Ethics, and Empirical Inquiry: A Reply to Lu and Lederman.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Who Pays the Heat Debt? Ethics, Labour, and Governance in a Warming World.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Respectful Debiasing in Democratic Deliberation.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Maintaining the Divide: The Legitimate Role for the Public in Health and Science Policymaking.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Living Medicine in the Shadow of Genocide.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Deliberative Groups and Health Measurement.

    Bioethics·2026

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Bioethics
    • Reproductive Rights

    Background:

    • The ethical and legal implications of sustaining pregnancy after a woman's death are complex and debated.
    • Existing frameworks for medical duties, such as beneficence and special relationships, may not adequately apply to postmortem pregnancy scenarios.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine the ethical obligations of physicians regarding the continuation of pregnancy following a woman's death in the first or second trimester.
    • To analyze whether beneficence-based duties or duties arising from special relationships compel physicians to sustain postmortem pregnancies.
    • To explore the concept of postmortem pregnancy in relation to human agency and the purposeful nature of pregnancy.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical analysis of ethical duties, including beneficence and special relationships.
    • Application of ethical theory to the specific context of postmortem pregnancy.
    • Distinction between purposeful human action and instinctual behavior (drawing on Marx) to interpret pregnancy.

    Main Results:

    • Physicians cannot assume a deceased woman's wish for pregnancy continuation.
    • The state's interest in fetal life before viability is often unclear, limiting legal impetus.
    • Beneficence-based duties are frequently unmet due to uncertain benefits to the child and burdens on others.
    • Duties of special relationship are difficult to establish between a deceased person and an unborn fetus.
    • Postmortem pregnancy is argued to undermine women's agency by reducing pregnancy to an instinctual, rather than purposeful, act.

    Conclusions:

    • Physicians likely do not have a duty to sustain pregnancies postmortem, as ethical conditions are often unmet.
    • The concept of postmortem pregnancy raises significant concerns about respecting women's autonomy and agency.
    • Viewing pregnancy as a purposeful, creative act underscores the ethical issues with non-consensual postmortem continuation.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachDeath and EuthanasiaGenetics and Reproduction

    Related Experiment Videos