Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Whistleblowing: a very unpleasant avocation.

Robert L Sprague

    Ethics & Behavior
    |January 1, 1993
    PubMed
    Summary

    This article details the scientific fraud investigation of Stephen E. Breuning and the repercussions for the whistleblower. It offers a firsthand perspective on the case and its outcomes.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Tremor frequency profile as a function of level of mental retardation.

    American journal of mental retardation : AJMR·2007
    Same author

    Onset of dyskinesia and changes in postural task performance during the course of neuroleptic withdrawal.

    American journal of mental retardation : AJMR·2002
    Same author

    Scientific misconduct: individual deviance or system complacency?

    Journal of information ethics·1996
    Same author

    Obtaining consent in a clinical setting.

    IRB·1985

    Area of Science:

    • Behavioral Science
    • Scientific Integrity

    Background:

    • Scientific misconduct poses a significant threat to research integrity.
    • Whistleblower protections are crucial in addressing fraud within academic and research settings.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To provide a firsthand account of an investigation into scientific fraud.
    • To examine the consequences faced by a whistleblower in a scientific misconduct case.

    Main Methods:

    • Qualitative analysis of personal experience.
    • Case study approach detailing investigative and sanctioning processes.

    Main Results:

    • The investigation led to the sanctioning of Stephen E. Breuning for scientific fraud.
    • The whistleblower experienced significant adverse consequences.

    Conclusions:

    • Cases of scientific fraud require thorough investigation and appropriate sanctions.
    • The personal and professional impact on whistleblowers warrants careful consideration and support.
    Keywords:
    Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health AdministrationBiomedical and Behavioral ResearchNational Institute of Mental HealthU.S. CongressUniversity of Pittsburgh

    Related Experiment Videos