Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Killing, letting die and the bare difference argument.

Roy W Perrett

    Bioethics
    |April 1, 1996
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Valuing lives.

    Bioethics·1992
    Same journal

    Surrogacy and the Moral Significance of Gestation: Reassessing Procreative Responsibilities.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Capable, Unbearably Suffering, and Excluded: People With Mental Illness and the Ethics of Canada's Assisted-Dying Regime.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Transhumanism Without Transindividuation in the Age Without Epochality: Stiegler, Vice, and Radical Human Enhancement.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Between Safeguard and Constraint: Navigating Patient Autonomy in Protective Laws for Medical Assistance in Dying.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Bioethics of Space Exploration: Life, Risk, and Responsibility Beyond Earth.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    The Concept of Harm in Medical Ethics.

    Bioethics·2026
    See all related articles

    There is no inherent moral distinction between actively killing and passively letting die. This philosophical argument, the Bare Difference Argument, asserts that the act versus omission distinction lacks moral weight.

    Area of Science:

    • Moral Philosophy
    • Ethics
    • Applied Ethics

    Background:

    • The distinction between killing and letting die is a central issue in moral philosophy.
    • Philosophers debate whether acts of commission are intrinsically more morally reprehensible than omissions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To argue that there is no intrinsic moral difference between killing and letting die.
    • To defend the Bare Difference Argument against recent criticisms.

    Main Methods:

    • The study employs the Bare Difference Argument, a thought experiment.
    • It analyzes hypothetical scenarios to isolate moral differences.

    Main Results:

    • The Bare Difference Argument, when correctly understood, demonstrates that the distinction between killing and letting die is not intrinsically morally significant.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachDeath and EuthanasiaPhilosophical Approach

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Criticisms of the argument, such as those by Winston Nesbitt, are based on a misunderstanding of its logical structure.

    • Conclusions:

    • The moral evaluation of actions should not solely rely on the act/omission distinction.
    • The Bare Difference Argument remains a valid tool for ethical analysis, refuting the idea that killing is inherently worse than letting die.