Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Disagreement, consensus, and moral integrity.

Ruth Macklin

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
    |September 1, 1996
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Tailoring Sexual Health Research Practices to Meet the Needs of Adolescent Girls in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Findings from Mexico.

    Adolescents (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
    Same author

    Defying the will of the people: The US Supreme Court overturns right to abortion.

    Indian journal of medical ethics·2022
    Same author

    Abortion laws in the United States: Turning the calendar back 50 years?

    Indian journal of medical ethics·2022
    Same author

    Salud publica de Mexico·2022
    Same author

    Another Defense of Common Morality.

    Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2022
    Same author

    A new definition for global bioethics: COVID-19, a case study.

    Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica·2022
    Same journal

    Coming to America: Bioethical Training at the Kennedy Institute of Ethics and the Establishment of Medical Ethics in Germany.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    A Reply to Bernstein, Jayaram, and Hutler's "Assessing the Liberty-Based Case Against Pandemic Lockdowns".

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    Assessing the Liberty-Based Case Against Pandemic Lockdowns.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    Relational Autonomy in Nonideal Medical Decision-Making.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    Ambiguous Invitations: Nonmaleficence, Uncertainty Attitudes and Public Health Policy.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    Editor's Note, June 2025.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    See all related articles

    The Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments reached consensus on ethical conclusions and recommendations, despite internal disagreements regarding evidence standards and notification protocols for past radiation studies.

    Area of Science:

    • Ethics in scientific research
    • History of science and technology
    • Public health policy

    Background:

    • The Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments convened to review past human radiation studies.
    • Deliberations were marked by internal disagreements among committee members.

    Observation:

    • A core controversy centered on the epistemological standards for ethical judgments in research.
    • Discussions also addressed the appropriate function of governmental advisory bodies.
    • The timing and necessity of notifying individuals exposed in past radiation experiments were debated.

    Findings:

    • Consensus was achieved on nearly all findings and recommendations.
    • The committee's process allowed for diverse viewpoints while maintaining integrity.
    Keywords:
    Advisory Committee on Human Radiation ExperimentsAnalytical ApproachBiomedical and Behavioral ResearchCold WarFederal Advisory Committee ActU.S. Congress

    Related Experiment Videos

    Implications:

    • Establishes a precedent for ethical review in scientific research involving human subjects.
    • Informs future governmental advisory committee operations and transparency.
    • Highlights the importance of clear ethical frameworks and evidence evaluation in scientific inquiry.