Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Transporting values by technology transfer.

Leonardo D De Castro

    Bioethics
    |July 1, 1997
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Introducing new medical technologies requires cultural sensitivity. In the Philippines, transplant technology adoption overlooked socio-cultural values, risking conflict and erosion of indigenous traditions.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Age Matters but it should not be Used to Discriminate Against the Elderly in Allocating Scarce Resources in the Context of COVID-19.

    Asian bioethics review·2020
    Same author

    Organ donation in the Philippines: should the dead do more?

    Indian journal of medical ethics·2014
    Same author

    Governance of biomedical research in Singapore and the challenge of conflicts of interest.

    Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2014
    Same author

    The declaration of Istanbul in the Philippines: success with foreigners but a continuing challenge for local transplant tourism.

    Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2013
    Same author

    The ethics of organ transplantation: shortages and strategies.

    Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore·2009
    Same author

    Ethics committees in Asia.

    Notizie di Politeia·2004
    Same journal

    Capable, Unbearably Suffering, and Excluded: People With Mental Illness and the Ethics of Canada's Assisted-Dying Regime.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Transhumanism Without Transindividuation in the Age Without Epochality: Stiegler, Vice, and Radical Human Enhancement.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Between Safeguard and Constraint: Navigating Patient Autonomy in Protective Laws for Medical Assistance in Dying.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Bioethics of Space Exploration: Life, Risk, and Responsibility Beyond Earth.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    The Concept of Harm in Medical Ethics.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    On the Destruction and Humanitarianisation of the Health System in Gaza and the Need for a Biopolitical Bioethics.

    Bioethics·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Technology Transfer
    • Socio-cultural Impact
    • Health Policy

    Background:

    • New medical technologies offer hope but carry inherent values.
    • Adoption without considering local socio-cultural context can be problematic.
    • Medical practitioners' utilization of new tech reflects professional standing.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine the socio-cultural implications of medical technology transfer.
    • To highlight the need for cultural sensitivity in adopting new medical technologies.
    • To analyze the challenges in the Philippines' transplant technology adoption.

    Main Methods:

    • Qualitative analysis of medical technology adoption processes.
    • Review of socio-cultural factors influencing healthcare practices.
    Keywords:
    Death and EuthanasiaHealth Care and Public Health

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Case study approach focusing on the Philippines' transplant initiatives.

    • Main Results:

    • The transfer of medical technology involves the transfer of values.
    • Neglecting socio-cultural peculiarities can lead to value conflicts.
    • Philippines' transplant technology efforts overlooked essential cultural considerations.

    Conclusions:

    • Smooth technology transfer requires sensitivity to local social conditions and traditions.
    • Legislative mandates alone cannot overcome deeply held cultural values.
    • Addressing value confrontations is crucial to prevent erosion of indigenous values and minimize intrusiveness of beneficial medical technology.