Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Managed care: how economic incentive reforms went wrong.

Madison Powers

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
    |October 20, 2001
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A social justice framework for health and science policy.

    Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2011
    Same author

    What does social justice require for the public's health? Public health ethics and policy imperatives.

    Health affairs (Project Hope)·2006
    Same author

    An Institutional Review Board dilemma: responsible for safety monitoring but not in control.

    Clinical trials (London, England)·2006
    Same author

    Bioethics as politics: the limits of moral expertise.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2005
    Same author

    Inequalities in health, inequalities in health care: four generations of discussion about justice and cost-effectiveness analysis.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2001
    Same author

    Which way for Medicare?

    The Washington post·1997
    Same journal

    Coming to America: Bioethical Training at the Kennedy Institute of Ethics and the Establishment of Medical Ethics in Germany.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    A Reply to Bernstein, Jayaram, and Hutler's "Assessing the Liberty-Based Case Against Pandemic Lockdowns".

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    Assessing the Liberty-Based Case Against Pandemic Lockdowns.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    Relational Autonomy in Nonideal Medical Decision-Making.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    Ambiguous Invitations: Nonmaleficence, Uncertainty Attitudes and Public Health Policy.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    Same journal

    Editor's Note, June 2025.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
    See all related articles

    The American healthcare system adopted managed care without comprehensive reform, leading to potential declines in medical innovation and quality. This approach also neglects long-term accountability in healthcare resource allocation.

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare policy
    • Health economics
    • Medical innovation

    Background:

    • The US healthcare system has implemented managed care in response to cost-containment pressures.
    • This adoption occurred without comprehensive reforms, unlike centralized systems in Europe/Canada or the Clinton plan.
    • Current managed care lacks managed competition, employer mandates, and universal access.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the inherent problems within the incentive structure of managed care plans.
    • To evaluate the impact of managed care on medical innovation, quality of care, and equity.
    • To assess the effectiveness of current managed care models in ensuring long-term accountability.

    Main Methods:

    • Qualitative analysis of healthcare system structures and policy responses.
    Keywords:
    Clinton Health Security PlanHealth Care and Public Health

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of incentive mechanisms within managed care organizations.
  • Comparative analysis of US managed care with international healthcare models.

    • Main Results:

    • Managed care adoption in the US has not been accompanied by comprehensive reform, creating a system without managed competition or universal access.
    • Potential sacrifices in medical innovation and quality of care may not be compensated by improved healthcare distribution equity.
    • Existing managed care frameworks exhibit deficiencies in establishing long-term accountability.

    Conclusions:

    • The current US managed care model, implemented without broader reform, presents significant challenges to the public interest.
    • There is a critical need to re-evaluate managed care incentives to safeguard medical innovation, quality, and equitable access.
    • Future healthcare reforms must prioritize long-term accountability alongside resource allocation and access.