Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

What can religion offer bioethics?

James P Wind

    The Hastings Center Report
    |July 1, 1990
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Religious communities offer valuable moral discourse, providing alternative perspectives to societal individualism. These "publics" can enrich public discourse with diverse imaginations about humanity.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same journal

    Harm Reduction as an Alternative to Mandated Drug Treatment.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Rethinking Mandated Drug Treatment: Why Expanding Freedom Requires Structural Drug Policy Reform.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Banning Gender-Affirming Treatment for Minors: The Supreme Court Speaks.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Making the Move to a Learning System of Research Ethics.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Musical Performance and Biomedical Human Enhancement: Ethnographic Perspectives on Bioethical Questions.

    The Hastings Center report·2026
    Same journal

    Transformed but Not Cured: The Ethics of Describing Gene-Editing Therapy for Sickle Cell Disease.

    The Hastings Center report·2026

    Area of Science:

    • Sociology of Religion
    • Public Discourse Studies
    • Moral Philosophy

    Background:

    • Modern society often emphasizes individualism, potentially limiting diverse moral viewpoints.
    • The concept of 'publics' is typically associated with secular spheres of discourse.
    • Religious communities possess unique frameworks for moral reasoning and social imagination.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To challenge conventional definitions of public discourse.
    • To explore the role of religious communities as distinct 'publics'.
    • To examine how religious moral discourse can inform broader societal understanding.

    Main Methods:

    • Conceptual analysis of public discourse theory.
    • Examination of religious community structures as moral arenas.
    Keywords:
    Bioethics and Professional EthicsReligious Approach

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of individualistic versus community-based moral frameworks.

    • Main Results:

    • Religious communities function as vital "publics" for moral discourse.
    • These "publics" offer alternative models of humanity beyond individualism.
    • Religious moral discourse can provide valuable contrast and imagination for society.

    Conclusions:

    • Religious communities are significant, yet often overlooked, contributors to public moral discourse.
    • Integrating religious perspectives can foster a richer, more nuanced societal understanding of humanity.
    • Challenging the definition of public discourse is essential for inclusivity.