Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Compulsory sterilisation in Sweden.

Torbjörn Tännsjö

    Bioethics
    |October 20, 2001
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Swedish compulsory sterilization policies (1935-1975) faced unanimous moral condemnation. However, criticisms varied, highlighting the need for consistent ethical frameworks in reproductive technologies.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Should Parents of Neonates With Bleak Prognosis Be Encouraged to Opt for Another Child With Better Odds? On the Notion of Moral Replaceability.

    Pediatrics·2018
    Same author

    Philosophical aspects of body transplantation.

    Acta neurochirurgica·2016
    Same author

    [Surely we must be allowed to sleep into death].

    Lakartidningen·2013
    Same author

    [Palliative patient rights].

    Lakartidningen·2013
    Same author

    Honour-related threats and human rights: a qualitative study of Swedish healthcare providers' attitudes towards young women requesting a virginity certificate or hymen reconstruction.

    The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception·2013
    Same author

    [New foundation necessary for compulsory care].

    Lakartidningen·2013
    Same journal

    Transhumanism Without Transindividuation in the Age Without Epochality: Stiegler, Vice, and Radical Human Enhancement.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Between Safeguard and Constraint: Navigating Patient Autonomy in Protective Laws for Medical Assistance in Dying.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Bioethics of Space Exploration: Life, Risk, and Responsibility Beyond Earth.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    The Concept of Harm in Medical Ethics.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    On the Destruction and Humanitarianisation of the Health System in Gaza and the Need for a Biopolitical Bioethics.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Shaping Future Children, Sex Selection, and "Normal" Human Capacities.

    Bioethics·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Medical History
    • Reproductive Rights

    Background:

    • Swedish compulsory sterilization policies were enacted between 1935 and 1975.
    • A media discussion in 1997 led to widespread moral condemnation of this past medical practice.

    Observation:

    • The moral condemnation of past sterilization policies was unanimous.
    • However, the underlying reasons for rejection were inconsistent.
    • Common criticisms included arguments from autonomy, caution, and biological skepticism.

    Findings:

    • The ethical basis for criticizing past medical practices should inform present and future medical ethics.
    • Different critical viewpoints lead to divergent conclusions regarding current medical practices.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachGenetics and Reproduction

    Related Experiment Videos

    Implications:

    • Adopting an argument from autonomy in criticizing past sterilization necessitates a liberal approach to reproductive technologies.
    • Inconsistent ethical reasoning can lead to contradictions in reproductive health policy and practice.