Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Equipoise, knowledge and ethics in clinical research and practice.

Richard Ashcroft

    Bioethics
    |October 20, 2001
    PubMed
    Summary

    Clinical trial ethics require equipoise, or cognitive indifference between treatments. While recent epistemological work offers insights, the concept of equipoise remains fundamentally incoherent despite its importance in justifying trials.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Randomised controlled trial to measure effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a digital social intervention promoted by primary care clinicians to adults with asthma to improve asthma control: protocol.

    BMJ open·2025
    Same author

    Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in migrants in primary care <i>versus</i> secondary care.

    The European respiratory journal·2024
    Same author

    Diagnosis and management of selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancies: A cross-sectional international survey.

    BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2024
    Same author

    Ethical considerations of a randomised controlled trial of fetal intervention versus expectant management in monochorionic twin pregnancies with early-onset selective fetal growth restriction.

    BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2024
    Same author

    Improving Development of Drug Treatments for Pregnant Women and the Fetus.

    Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science·2022
    Same author

    Cohort Profile: East London Genes & Health (ELGH), a community-based population genomics and health study in British Bangladeshi and British Pakistani people.

    International journal of epidemiology·2019

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Clinical Trial Design
    • Epistemology

    Background:

    • Ethical clinical trials necessitate equipoise, defined as cognitive indifference regarding treatment efficacy.
    • Equipoise is considered essential for beneficence, non-maleficence, and fairness in randomized treatment assignments.
    • The precise definition and application of equipoise, including whose perspective matters, remain subjects of debate.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine recent epistemological reconstructions of equipoise-like concepts.
    • To assess the success of these reconstructions in understanding equipoise cognitively.
    • To evaluate the coherence of equipoise as a justification for clinical trials.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of recent work in epistemology related to equipoise.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachBiomedical and Behavioral Research

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Critical examination of cognitive theories of equipoise.
  • Discussion of the social management versus cognitive significance of equipoise judgments.
  • Main Results:

    • Recent epistemological work provides promising avenues for understanding equipoise cognitively.
    • Despite progress, current reconstructions of equipoise are deemed insufficient.
    • Equipoise, while the leading theory for clinical trial justification, is identified as incoherent.

    Conclusions:

    • Further development is needed to refine the cognitive understanding of equipoise.
    • The concept of equipoise, as currently formulated, presents significant theoretical challenges.
    • Despite its incoherence, equipoise remains the most influential framework for the ethical justification of clinical trials.