Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Hope and deception.

William Ruddick

|October 20, 2001

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Physicians often support patient hopes, even false ones, raising ethical debates. Balancing therapeutic hope with patient autonomy requires careful consideration of deception and differing hope perspectives.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A Novel Immunocompetent Mouse Model for Testing Antifungal Drugs Against Invasive <i>Candida albicans</i> Infection.

Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)·2020

Same author

Today´s medical self and the other: Challenges and evolving solutions for enhanced humanization and quality of care.

PloS one·2017

Same author

Potent in vitro and in vivo antifungal activity of a small molecule host defense peptide mimic through a membrane-active mechanism.

Scientific reports·2017

Same author

Answering parents' questions.

The Journal of clinical ethics·2003

Same author

Do doctors undertreat pain?

Bioethics·1997

Same journal

Surrogacy and the Moral Significance of Gestation: Reassessing Procreative Responsibilities.

Bioethics·2026

Same journal

Capable, Unbearably Suffering, and Excluded: People With Mental Illness and the Ethics of Canada's Assisted-Dying Regime.

Bioethics·2026

Same journal

Transhumanism Without Transindividuation in the Age Without Epochality: Stiegler, Vice, and Radical Human Enhancement.

Bioethics·2026

Same journal

Between Safeguard and Constraint: Navigating Patient Autonomy in Protective Laws for Medical Assistance in Dying.

Bioethics·2026

Same journal

Bioethics of Space Exploration: Life, Risk, and Responsibility Beyond Earth.

Bioethics·2026

Same journal

The Concept of Harm in Medical Ethics.

Bioethics·2026

See all related articles

Area of Science:

Medical Ethics
Philosophy of Medicine
Clinical Psychology

Background:

Physicians frequently foster patient hopes, sometimes through deception, leading to ethical conflicts with bioethicists regarding patient autonomy.
The therapeutic value of hope is acknowledged, but its use, especially when based on false premises, presents complex moral challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore the ethical implications of physicians supporting patient hopes, including false hopes.
To analyze the tension between therapeutic hope-giving and patient autonomy.
To propose a framework for navigating hope-related conflicts in medical decision-making.

Main Methods:

Philosophical analysis of ethical principles in medicine.
Examination of the concept of autonomy in the context of patient hopes.

Keywords:

Analytical Approach Professional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos

Discussion of the psychological underpinnings of hope, including optimism and self-deception.

Main Results:

Physicians' support of false hopes, while sometimes intended to benefit patients, can violate autonomy.
Patient 'possibility-hopes' may conflict with physician 'probability-hopes,' necessitating careful management.
Hopes, even if based on deception, can enhance autonomy by enabling patients to pursue chosen lives.

Conclusions:

A nuanced approach is needed, recognizing the harms of both lost hopes and maintained deceptive hopes.
Physicians may need to adjust their own professional hopes to accommodate patients' 'vital' or 'survival' hopes.
A principle of 'Hope-giving' could be integrated into medical ethics, alongside Beneficence and Autonomy, requiring further study.