Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

A care perspective on coercion and autonomy.

Marian Verkerk

    Bioethics
    |October 20, 2001
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Compassionate interference in psychiatric care challenges patient autonomy. This approach, though controversial, may paradoxically enhance patient autonomy and relationships by redefining care.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Qualitative study of GPs' views and experiences of population-based preconception expanded carrier screening in the Netherlands: bioethical perspectives.

    BMJ open·2021
    Same author

    GP-provided couple-based expanded preconception carrier screening in the Dutch general population: who accepts the test-offer and why?

    European journal of human genetics : EJHG·2019
    Same author

    Dynamics of dignity and safety: a discussion.

    BMJ quality & safety·2018
    Same author

    Suffering in children: opinions from parents and health-care professionals.

    European journal of pediatrics·2014
    Same author

    Toward a naturalized clinical ethics.

    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2013
    Same author

    Training healthcare professionals as moral case deliberation facilitators: evaluation of a Dutch training programme.

    Journal of medical ethics·2012
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Area of Science:

    • Psychiatry
    • Bioethics
    • Philosophy of Care

    Background:

    • A debate exists in the Netherlands regarding 'compassionate interference' in psychiatric care.
    • Current practices emphasize patient autonomy and non-interference, creating a paradox for patients needing relational support.
    • Existing care models may not adequately address the relational needs of psychiatric patients.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the concept of 'compassionate interference' as a component of good psychiatric care.
    • To critically reevaluate current conceptions of caring relationships and their underlying values.
    • To propose an alternative perspective where compassionate interference fosters autonomy.

    Main Methods:

    • Conceptual analysis of 'compassionate interference' and patient autonomy.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachProfessional Patient Relationship

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Ethical examination of current psychiatric care practices in the Netherlands.
  • Literature review on patient autonomy and relational needs in mental health.

    • Main Results:

    • The principle of non-interference, while respecting autonomy, can hinder patients' access to essential relational support.
    • 'Compassionate interference' has faced criticism as 'modern paternalism'.
    • A redefinition of autonomy is necessary to reconcile non-interference with the need for intervention.

    Conclusions:

    • Current care practices present a dichotomy that fails to meet the holistic needs of psychiatric patients.
    • Revisiting the definition of autonomy is crucial for integrating 'compassionate interference' effectively.
    • 'Compassionate interference' can be reconceptualized not as a threat, but as a pathway to achieving genuine patient autonomy.