Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Desire-based and value-based normative reasons.

Julian Savulescu

    Bioethics
    |October 20, 2001
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Clinical psychedelic research in adolescents: a scoping review and overview of ethical considerations.

    The Lancet. Child & adolescent health·2025
    Same author

    Digital Doppelgängers, Human Relationships, and Practical Identity.

    Bioethics·2025
    Same author

    Chat-IRB? How application-specific language models can enhance research ethics review.

    Journal of medical ethics·2025
    Same author

    When to create embryos or organoids for research.

    Journal of medical ethics·2025
    Same author

    Generative AI in healthcare education: How AI literacy gaps could compromise learning and patient safety.

    Nurse education in practice·2025
    Same author

    Academic freedom, artificial intelligence and the blandification of ethics.

    Journal of medical ethics·2025
    Same journal

    Transhumanism Without Transindividuation in the Age Without Epochality: Stiegler, Vice, and Radical Human Enhancement.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Between Safeguard and Constraint: Navigating Patient Autonomy in Protective Laws for Medical Assistance in Dying.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Bioethics of Space Exploration: Life, Risk, and Responsibility Beyond Earth.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    The Concept of Harm in Medical Ethics.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    On the Destruction and Humanitarianisation of the Health System in Gaza and the Need for a Biopolitical Bioethics.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Shaping Future Children, Sex Selection, and "Normal" Human Capacities.

    Bioethics·2026
    See all related articles

    This response critiques John Harris's view on healthcare justice, arguing his desire-based reasons for action are insufficient. It proposes a value-based account as a superior alternative for understanding normative reasons.

    Area of Science:

    • Philosophy of Medicine
    • Ethics
    • Normative Theory

    Background:

    • John Harris's work on 'Justice and Equal Opportunities in Health Care' presents a specific perspective on healthcare allocation.
    • A broader philosophical debate exists concerning the nature of reasons for action and their normative basis.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To respond to John Harris's arguments regarding justice and equal opportunities in healthcare.
    • To differentiate the author's position from Harris's by analyzing their underlying conceptions of reasons for action.
    • To critique desire-based accounts of normative reasons and advocate for a value-based alternative.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical argumentation and conceptual analysis.
    • Critique of existing theories (desire-based reasons).
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachHealth Care and Public Health

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Development and proposal of an alternative framework (value-based reasons).

    • Main Results:

    • Identifies Harris's position as relying on a desire-based conception of normative reasons.
    • Highlights limitations and deficiencies inherent in desire-based accounts.
    • Presents a value-based conception of reasons as a more robust alternative.

    Conclusions:

    • The debate on healthcare justice is significantly influenced by the underlying theory of normative reasons.
    • A value-based account offers a more philosophically sound foundation for understanding reasons for action in ethical contexts, including healthcare.
    • Shifting from desire-based to value-based reasons has implications for how we approach concepts like justice and equal opportunities.