Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Whose genome project?

Darryl Macer

    Bioethics
    |July 1, 1991
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The Human Genome Project aims to map and sequence human DNA, raising critical ethical questions about ownership, funding, and benefit distribution. Examining these issues from multiple viewpoints is crucial for responsible scientific advancement.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Ethical Poultry and the Bioethics of Poultry Production.

    The journal of poultry science·2020
    Same author

    Food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices among consumers in developing countries: An international survey.

    Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.)·2019
    Same author

    How to Enhance Engagement in Bioethics in the Developing World for Global Bioethics.

    The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2017
    Same author

    Ethical conditions for transnational gestational surrogacy in Asia.

    The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2014
    Same author

    A public ethos of enhancement across Asia.

    The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2014
    Same author

    Ethical consequences of the positive views of enhancement in Asia.

    Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy·2012
    Same journal

    Surrogacy and the Moral Significance of Gestation: Reassessing Procreative Responsibilities.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Capable, Unbearably Suffering, and Excluded: People With Mental Illness and the Ethics of Canada's Assisted-Dying Regime.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Transhumanism Without Transindividuation in the Age Without Epochality: Stiegler, Vice, and Radical Human Enhancement.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Between Safeguard and Constraint: Navigating Patient Autonomy in Protective Laws for Medical Assistance in Dying.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    Bioethics of Space Exploration: Life, Risk, and Responsibility Beyond Earth.

    Bioethics·2026
    Same journal

    The Concept of Harm in Medical Ethics.

    Bioethics·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Genomics
    • Bioethics
    • Medical Research

    Background:

    • The Human Genome Project is an international research effort to determine the DNA sequence of the entire human genome.
    • This ambitious project carries significant scientific, medical, economic, ethical, legal, and social implications.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the fundamental question of "Whose genome project is it?"
    • To analyze the ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) arising from the Human Genome Project from various perspectives.
    • To compare theoretical ethical considerations with practical implementation in the project.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical inquiry and ethical analysis.
    • Examination of project proposal, funding, research execution, data ownership, and benefit distribution.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachBiomedical and Behavioral ResearchGenetics and ReproductionHuman Genome Project

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of ethical frameworks and current practices.

    • Main Results:

    • The project's ownership and benefits are complex, involving multiple stakeholders.
    • Ethical questions surrounding data access, intellectual property, and equitable benefit sharing are paramount.
    • Discrepancies may exist between ethical ideals and the project's practical execution.

    Conclusions:

    • Addressing the "Whose genome project is it?" question requires careful consideration of diverse ethical viewpoints.
    • Proactive ethical deliberation is essential for navigating the complexities of large-scale genomic research.
    • Aligning project practices with ethical principles ensures responsible scientific progress and societal benefit.