Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Error in radiology.

P Goddard¹, A Leslie, A Jones

¹Bristol Royal Infirmary, UK.

The British Journal of Radiology

|October 25, 2001

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

IncC of broad-host-range plasmid RK2 modulates KorB transcriptional repressor activity In vivo and operator binding in vitro.

Journal of bacteriology·1999

Same author

'Listen, listen trust your own strange voice' (psychoanalytically informed conversations with a woman suffering serious illness).

Journal of advanced nursing·1999

Same author

p53 and p53-regulated genes in bladder cancer.

BJU international·1999

Same author

Angiogenesis in urological malignancy: prognostic indicator and therapeutic target.

BJU international·1999

Same author

Functional genomics in Caenorhabditis elegans: An approach involving comparisons of sequences from related nematodes.

Genome research·1999

Same author

Directed evolution of a fungal peroxidase.

Nature biotechnology·1999

Same journal

Radioligand therapy for paediatric patients with solid tumours.

The British journal of radiology·2026

Same journal

Vertebral computed tomography attenuation to case-find low bone density in people undergoing lung cancer screening.

The British journal of radiology·2026

Same journal

Machine learning models using 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics for RAS mutation prediction and prognostic stratification in colorectal cancer.

The British journal of radiology·2026

Same journal

Predictors of Relapse in Oligometastatic Prostate Patients Receiving Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy.

The British journal of radiology·2026

Same journal

An Evaluation of Radiotherapy and Response in the Management of Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumors.

The British journal of radiology·2026

Same journal

Ensuring radiology reporting quality across a national lung cancer screening programme.

The British journal of radiology·2026

See all related articles

Radiology errors range from 2-20% for significant findings, varying by investigation type. Systemic changes, not just double reading, are key to reducing these medical errors.

Area of Science:

Medical Imaging
Radiology
Patient Safety

Background:

Medical errors in radiology are a significant concern.
The accuracy of radiological interpretations directly impacts patient care and outcomes.
Understanding error rates is crucial for improving diagnostic quality.

Purpose of the Study:

To quantify the error rate in diagnostic radiology.
To identify the effectiveness of double reading in reducing errors.
To determine the primary drivers for error reduction in radiology.

Main Methods:

Systematic review of literature on radiology errors.
Analysis of studies focusing on double reporting or double reading.
Tabulation of error levels across different radiological investigations.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

The level of clinically significant or major error in radiology ranges from 2% to 20%.
Error rates are dependent on the specific type of radiological investigation.
The study indicates that systemic changes offer the greatest potential for error reduction.

Conclusions:

Radiology error rates are substantial and variable.
While double reading may help, systemic improvements are paramount for significant error reduction.
Future efforts should focus on optimizing radiological workflows and systems to enhance patient safety.