Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pain and systematic reviews.

R A Moore1

  • 1Pain Research & Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, University of Oxford, The Churchill, Oxford, UK. andrew.moore@pru.ox.ac.uk

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
|October 31, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparing pain intensity rating scales in acute postoperative pain: boundary values and category disagreements.

Anaesthesia·2023
Same author

Whole-genome and transcriptome analysis enhances precision cancer treatment options.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2022
Same author

Correction to: Dexketoprofen/tramadol 25 mg/75 mg: randomised double-blind trial in moderate-to-severe acute pain after abdominal hysterectomy.

BMC anesthesiology·2017
Same author

Successful targeting of the NRG1 pathway indicates novel treatment strategy for metastatic cancer.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2017
Same author

Dexketoprofen/tramadol 25 mg/75 mg: randomised double-blind trial in moderate-to-severe acute pain after abdominal hysterectomy.

BMC anesthesiology·2016
Same author

Randomized clinical trial of dexketoprofen/tramadol 25 mg/75 mg in moderate-to-severe pain after total hip arthroplasty.

British journal of anaesthesia·2016
Same journal

Early Labour Epidural for Parturients With High BMI-A National Danish Survey.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2026
Same journal

Contrast Media and Acute Kidney Injury in the ICU.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2026
Same journal

The Impact of Diuretics on Mortality in Acute Kidney Injury With or Without Fluid Accumulation in Intensive Care-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2026
Same journal

Authors' Response to "Vasopressors in Early Burn Resuscitation: Physiological Concerns Revisited".

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2026
Same journal

Prognostic Factors for Postoperative Complications. An Aggregate Protocol for 10 Observational Studies From the Danish TRIPLE-A Cohort of 1.2 Million Surgeries.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2026
Same journal

Backrest Position and Outcome in Comatose Survivors of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Protocol for a Multi-Center Randomized Comparison Within the Danish Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (DANOHCA) Trial.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2026
See all related articles

Systematic literature reviews distill vast medical information, applying quality filters to generate unbiased knowledge. Tools like numbers needed to treat (NNT) empower informed clinical decision-making for optimal patient care.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Informatics
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • The medical literature is vast and contains a mix of useful and non-useful information.
  • Effective knowledge synthesis is crucial for clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline a process for distilling medical literature into usable knowledge.
  • To emphasize the importance of quality filtering and contextualization.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature review methodology.
  • Application of quality filters to medical information.
  • Utilizing quantitative tools such as numbers needed to treat (NNT).

Main Results:

  • Systematic reviews provide a solid, unbiased knowledge base.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Tools like NNT offer a quantifiable basis for treatment choices.

    • Conclusions:

    • Systematic literature review is essential for generating reliable medical knowledge.
    • Evidence-based tools support informed decision-making in healthcare.
    • Wisdom in applying medical knowledge is achievable through rigorous review processes.