Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

An ethics framework for public health.

N E Kass1

  • 1Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, and the Johns Hopkins University Bioethics Institute, Baltimore, Md, USA. nkass@jhsph.edu

American Journal of Public Health
|October 31, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evolving values in ethics and global health research.

Global public health·2010
Same author

Payment to healthy volunteers in clinical research: the research subject's perspective.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2010
Same author

Understanding respect: learning from patients.

Journal of medical ethics·2009
Same author

Balancing justice and autonomy in clinical research with healthy volunteers.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2007
Same author

Ethical review of health research: a perspective from developing country researchers.

Journal of medical ethics·2004
Same author

Adrenoleukodystrophy: incidence, new mutation rate, and results of extended family screening.

Annals of neurology·2001
Same journal

Erratum In: "Ogunbajo et al. Respond".

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

The Role of Gender in HIV Care Engagement Among Individuals Assigned Male Sex at Birth: Medical Monitoring Project, United States, 2015-2022.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Domestic Returns to Predictable US Participation in the World Health Organization: Health Security and Cost.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

The Risks of Mortality, Cardiovascular Events, and Pulmonary Complications in Cancer Patients Who Smoke Cigarettes and Switch to E-Cigarettes: South Korea, 2015‒2022.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Retailers CARE Program in Montgomery County, Ohio, Partners With Alcohol, Tobacco, and Lottery Retailers to Promote Healthier Communities.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Trends in Sexual Activity, Condom Use, and Use of Pregnancy Prevention Methods Among Female Adolescents: United States, 2007-2023.

American journal of public health·2026
See all related articles

Public health ethics require balancing population health with individual liberties. A proposed framework guides interventions to reduce harm, ensure fairness, and promote social justice.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Bioethics
  • Health Policy

Background:

  • Public health, established over a century ago, focuses on population well-being.
  • Its population-centered approach often creates ethical tensions regarding individual liberties.
  • Balancing public health goals with individual rights remains a persistent challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a framework for the ethical analysis of public health programs.
  • To guide public health interventions in a manner that respects individual liberties and promotes social justice.
  • To provide a structured approach for evaluating the ethical dimensions of public health initiatives.

Main Methods:

  • The article presents a framework for ethical analysis of public health interventions.
Keywords:
Health Care and Public Health

Related Experiment Videos

  • This framework outlines criteria for evaluating the ethical acceptability of public health programs.
  • It emphasizes evidence-based decision-making and fair procedural justice.

    • Main Results:

    • Public health interventions should aim to reduce morbidity and mortality.
    • Programmatic effectiveness must be substantiated by data.
    • Burdens must be identified, minimized, and distributed fairly, addressing existing social injustices.

    Conclusions:

    • Ethical public health practice requires a systematic approach to balancing population benefits with individual rights.
    • Fair procedures are essential for community acceptance of program burdens.
    • The proposed framework supports advancing public health goals while upholding individual liberties and social justice.