Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Grading in soft tissue tumors: principles and problems.

A M Oliveira1, A G Nascimento

  • 1Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Skeletal Radiology
|October 31, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cytogenetic and pollen analysis in Passiflora triloba (Passifloraceae).

Brazilian journal of biology = Revista brasleira de biologia·2025
Same author

Arteritis, aneurysm and thromboembolic colic caused by migration of Strongylus vulgaris larvae in equids.

Journal of equine veterinary science·2025
Same author

Efficacy and safety of office-based procedures for hemorrhoidal disease in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Techniques in coloproctology·2025
Same author

Corrigendum to "SELNET clinical practice guidelines for soft tissue sarcoma and GIST" [Cancer Treat. Rev. 102 (2021) 102312].

Cancer treatment reviews·2023
Same author

Cutaneous phaeohyphomycosis in a greater bulldog bat (Noctilio leporinus) in northeastern Brazil.

Journal of comparative pathology·2023
Same author

Corrigendum to "SELNET clinical practice guidelines for bone sarcoma" Critical reviews in oncology/hematology, vol. 174 (2022), 1-10.

Critical reviews in oncology/hematology·2022
Same journal

Imaging characterization and differential diagnosis of delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) in athletes.

Skeletal radiology·2026
Same journal

Imaging of hand and wrist injuries in alpine skiing: common injury mechanisms, imaging findings, and treatment.

Skeletal radiology·2026
Same journal

MRI-Based radiomic signature for predicting pathologic treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and radioimmunotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma.

Skeletal radiology·2026
Same journal

Subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis: ultrasound findings and histopathologic correlation.

Skeletal radiology·2026
Same journal

Knee injuries in skiing and snowboarding athletes.

Skeletal radiology·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for meniscal tear patterns in ACL-deficient knees: comparison with arthroscopic findings.

Skeletal radiology·2026
See all related articles

Histologic grading is crucial for soft tissue sarcoma prognosis. Current systems like French Federation of Cancer Centers (FNCLCC) and National Cancer Institute (NCI) have limitations, necessitating improved, reproducible grading systems.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pathology
  • Surgical Oncology

Background:

  • Histologic grading is a key prognostic factor for soft tissue sarcomas.
  • Current grading systems, such as French Federation of Cancer Centers (FNCLCC) and National Cancer Institute (NCI), rely on morphologic features.
  • These systems face challenges due to sarcoma heterogeneity and lack of standardization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically analyze existing soft tissue sarcoma grading systems.
  • To identify limitations in current prognostic assessment.
  • To propose alternatives for more reproducible and predictive grading.

Main Methods:

  • Review and critical analysis of established histologic grading systems for soft tissue sarcomas.
  • Evaluation of morphologic predictors and their limitations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Consideration of emerging technologies for improved prognostic capabilities.

    • Main Results:

    • Existing grading systems (FNCLCC, NCI) show limitations in accuracy due to sarcoma heterogeneity and inconsistent criteria.
    • Prognostic over- or underestimation can occur.
    • Lack of standardization and omission of clinical factors hinder universal acceptance.

    Conclusions:

    • Current grading systems for soft tissue sarcomas require refinement.
    • Advances in imaging, molecular genetics, and data analysis offer potential for more accurate and reproducible prognostic tools.
    • Development of improved grading systems is essential for better patient outcomes.