Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Urologic laparoscopy.

C L Jackson1

  • 1Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA.

Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America
|November 1, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Laparoscopic urologic surgery, especially for cancer, offers oncologic results comparable to open surgery. Despite a steep learning curve, experience reduces complications and operative time, paving the way for wider adoption.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Author Correction: Proteomic profiling identifies muscle-invasive bladder cancers with distinct biology and responses to platinum-based chemotherapy.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Proteomic profiling identifies muscle-invasive bladder cancers with distinct biology and responses to platinum-based chemotherapy.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Multimodal Biomarkers That Predict the Presence of Gleason Pattern 4: Potential Impact for Active Surveillance.

The Journal of urology·2023
Same author

A prospective study of type 2 diabetes, metformin use, and risk of breast cancer.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2021
Same author

Impact of an integrated model of care on potentially preventable hospitalizations for people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2015
Same author

Model of care for the management of complex Type 2 diabetes managed in the community by primary care physicians with specialist support: an open controlled trial.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2013
Same journal

Small Incisions, Big Impact-Robotic Surgery Is Revolutionizing Cancer Care.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery for Cancer.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

TeleSurgery: The Present and the Future for Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive/Robotic Surgery for Colon Cancer.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive Surgery in Liver Transplantation.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Oncology

Background:

  • Laparoscopic urologic surgery initially focused on diagnostics and benign conditions, with many early procedures abandoned due to lack of benefit over open surgery.
  • The treatment of urologic malignancies is now the primary indication for laparoscopic urologic surgery, with established oncologic outcomes for nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the current status and future prospects of laparoscopic urologic surgery, particularly in the context of treating urologic malignancies.
  • To address the slow adoption of laparoscopy by urologists despite demonstrated advantages over open techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing data on laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, nephroureterectomy, and partial nephrectomy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of complication rates and operative times in relation to surgical experience.
  • Discussion of the learning curve associated with laparoscopic urologic procedures.

    • Main Results:

    • Maturing data show equivalent oncologic results for laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, nephroureterectomy, and partial nephrectomy compared to open surgery.
    • Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is an evolving application.
    • A significant portion of complications (71%) occurred within the first 20 cases, with risk and operative time declining substantially with experience (learning curve estimated at 30-40 cases).

    Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic urologic surgery, particularly for malignancies, offers comparable oncologic outcomes to open procedures.
    • The steep learning curve and lack of common, low-complexity procedures in urology contribute to slow adoption.
    • Advancements in techniques, equipment, and integrated training in residency/fellowship programs are crucial for establishing laparoscopy in urologic oncology treatment.