Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Screening for lung cancer.

R L Manser1, L B Irving, C Stone

  • 1Clinical Epidemiology and Health Service Evaluation Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3050. ManserRL@mh.org.au

The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
|November 1, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development and validation of a cephalosporin allergy clinical decision rule.

The Journal of infection·2025
Same author

The potential for carbon dioxide removal by enhanced rock weathering in the tropics: An evaluation of Costa Rica.

The Science of the total environment·2024
Same author

Pulse-shape discrimination against low-energy Ar-39 beta decays in liquid argon with 4.5 tonne-years of DEAP-3600 data.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2021
Same author

Association between anaesthetic technique and unplanned admission to intensive care after thoracic lung resection surgery.

Anaesthesia·2020
Same author

Method for Recording Broadband High Resolution Emission Spectra of Laboratory Lightning Arcs.

Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE·2019
Same author

First Report of Phakopsora pachyrhizi on Soybean in Costa Rica.

Plant disease·2019

Current lung cancer screening methods like chest radiography and sputum cytology lack proven effectiveness. Frequent chest x-ray screening may even increase lung cancer mortality, necessitating further rigorous trials.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Public Health
  • Diagnostic Imaging

Background:

  • The effectiveness of lung cancer screening modalities, including chest radiography, sputum cytology, and spiral CT, remains unestablished.
  • Existing evidence does not definitively support these methods for reducing lung cancer mortality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate whether regular screening for lung cancer using sputum examinations, chest radiography, or CT chest can decrease lung cancer mortality.
  • To synthesize evidence from controlled trials on the efficacy of lung cancer screening interventions.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive search of electronic databases, bibliographies, and expert consultations identified relevant published and unpublished trials.
  • Included were controlled trials assessing screening for lung cancer via sputum examination, chest radiography, or CT chest.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Intention-to-screen analysis was conducted, employing random-effect models for significant heterogeneity and fixed-effect models otherwise.
  • Main Results:

    • Seven trials (6 randomized, 1 non-randomized) involving 245,610 subjects were analyzed; none had an unscreened control group.
    • Frequent chest x-ray screening showed an 11% relative increase in lung cancer mortality compared to less frequent screening (RR 1.11, CI: 1.00-1.23).
    • A trend towards reduced lung cancer mortality was observed with combined chest x-ray and sputum cytology versus chest x-ray alone (RR 0.88, CI: 0.74-1.03), though not statistically significant. No controlled studies on spiral CT were found.

    Conclusions:

    • Current evidence does not support the use of chest radiography or sputum cytology for lung cancer screening.
    • Frequent chest x-ray screening may potentially be harmful.
    • There is a need for further methodologically rigorous trials to establish effective lung cancer screening strategies.