Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026
Hemocompatibility Testing of Blood-Contacting Implants in a Flow Loop Model Mimicking Human Blood Flow
Published on: March 5, 2020
Biocompatibility of Trillium Biopassive Surface-coated oxygenator versus uncoated oxygenator during cardiopulmonary
M H Ereth1, G A Nuttall, S H Clarke
1Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Objective:
To determine if the Trillium Biopassive Surface (Medtronic Cardiopulmonary, Minneapolis, MN) coating added to the cardiopulmonary bypass oxygenator reduces inflammatory mediators, blood loss, and transfusion requirements.
Design:
Prospective, randomized, and blinded human trial.
Setting:
Tertiary care academic medical center.
Participants:
Thirty adult patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Interventions:
Patients received visually identical coated or uncoated oxygenators.
Measurements And Main Results:
Hemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocyte count, platelet count, terminal complement complex, complement activation, myeloperoxidase, beta-thromboglobulin, prothrombin fragment 1.2, plasmin-antiplasmin, heparin concentration, activated coagulation time, and fibrinogen concentration were measured. Blood loss and blood product usage were recorded. In both groups, there were significant inflammatory alterations with the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass. In the postprotamine samples, the coated oxygenator group had small but significant increases in hemoglobin, hematocrit, and leukocyte count. There were no differences in inflammatory mediators, blood loss, or transfusion requirements between the coated and uncoated groups.
Conclusion:
This human trial of Trillium Biopassive Surface-coated oxygenators did not show clinical benefits or clinically important biochemical results.
