Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026
3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
Published on: August 4, 2020
Preprosthetic vertical distraction osteogenesis of the mandible using an L-shaped osteotomy and titanium membranes
C N Klug1, G A Millesi-Schobel, W Millesi
1Vienna University Medical School, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria. Klug@univie.ac.at
Purpose:
Vertical osteodistraction is a new alternative method for alveolar ridge augmentation of the mandible. The purpose of this article is describe a technique using an L-shaped osteotomy and titanium membranes for guided bone regeneration (GBR) in the distraction gap.
Patients And Methods:
Ten patients with severe atrophy of the edentulous molar region of the mandible underwent vertical callus distraction in 13 sites using intraoral microplate distractors. An L-shaped osteotomy with a short vertical part mesially and a longer horizontal part ending in the retromolar region was made, and the osteotomized segment was fixed to the mandibular ramus at its distal edge by a microplate, which became the center of rotation when distraction began. In this way, more callus generation could be achieved mesially than in the distal molar region. Follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans reconstructed axially to the axis of the mandible revealed semilunar excavations of the generated bone buccally in the distraction gap in the first cases. Clinical inspection on removal of the distractors showed fibrous connective tissue in the gap. Therefore, to prevent this from happening, titanium membranes covering the distraction gap were applied in subsequent cases.
Results:
Ten patients (13 sites) were treated by vertical callus distraction. In 4 cases, GBR was achieved using titanium membranes. In all cases, the increase in alveolar height was sufficient to make dental implantation possible. In 1 patient, a fracture of the distractor occurred, and dehiscence was observed in 2 cases. These complications did not change the plan of therapy nor did they influence the results. The CT scans showed a homogenous surface on the regenerated mandible in the cases of GBR application.
Conclusion:
Both an L-shaped osteotomy and the application of titanium membranes for GBR in the distraction gap are of great value for mandibular augmentation, producing a physiologically shaped alveolar ridge.
