Related Experiment Videos
Aspirin versus low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin: antithrombotic therapy in pediatric ischemic stroke patients: a
R Sträter1, K Kurnik, C Heller
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Münster, University of Munich, Germany.
Insights
Low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and aspirin show similar efficacy in preventing recurrent ischemic stroke in children. Further research is needed to confirm safety and effectiveness of these antithrombotic treatments.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Neurology
- Cardiovascular Research
- Hematology
Background:
- Pediatric ischemic stroke is a significant cause of morbidity.
- Secondary prevention strategies are crucial to reduce stroke recurrence.
- Understanding the comparative efficacy of antithrombotic agents is vital.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare medium-dose aspirin with low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for secondary stroke prevention in children.
- To assess the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke in pediatric patients receiving different antithrombotic treatments.
Main Methods:
- Prospective follow-up of 135 pediatric patients (aged 6 months to 18 years) with a first ischemic stroke.
- Patients received either aspirin (n=49) or LMWH (n=86) as prophylactic antithrombotic therapy.
- Median follow-up duration was 36 months, with recurrent stroke as the primary endpoint.
Main Results:
- Recurrent ischemic stroke occurred in 9.6% of patients (13 out of 135) within a median of 5 months.
- No significant difference in stroke recurrence rates was observed between aspirin and LMWH groups (P=0.76).
- In most recurrent cases (84.6%), the same vascular territory was affected. No major drug-related side effects were reported.
Conclusions:
- Low-dose LMWH is not superior to aspirin in preventing recurrent stroke in pediatric patients.
- Current evidence suggests comparable efficacy between aspirin and LMWH for secondary stroke prevention in this population.
- Larger, randomized controlled trials are necessary to definitively establish the safety and efficacy profiles of these antithrombotic medications.
Background And Purpose:
We sought to compare different antithrombotic secondary treatments (mainly medium-dose aspirin with low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin [LMWH]) in pediatric patients with a first ischemic stroke onset with regard to the risk of stroke recurrence.
Methods:
The population comprised 135 consecutively recruited children aged >/=6 months to =18 years with a first episode of ischemic stroke (idiopathic, n=79; cardiac, n=15; vascular, n=30; infectious, n=11). The stroke patients enrolled received prophylactic antithrombotic therapy (aspirin, n=49; LMWH, n=86) in a nonrandomized fashion and were prospectively followed up for a median (range) of 36 (8 to 48) months. The study end point was recurrent stroke.
Results:
Recurrent ischemic stroke was diagnosed at a median (range) of 5 (2 to 13) months after the first stroke onset in 13 of the 135 children (9.6%) receiving antithrombotic therapy. In the majority of cases (84.6%) the same vascular territory was involved. No significant difference was found with respect to the antithrombotic medication used (P=0.76, Fisher's exact test). No major drug-related side effects were observed.
Conclusions:
This prospective multicenter follow-up study has provided evidence that low-dose LMWH is not superior to aspirin and vice versa in preventing recurrent stroke in white pediatric stroke patients. However, further adequately sized randomized trials are required to obtain reliable information on safety and efficacy with respect to the antithrombotic medications used.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion